Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 26;14(1):29363.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80608-7.

Predictive dermoscopic features of cryotherapy treatment response in cutaneous warts

Affiliations

Predictive dermoscopic features of cryotherapy treatment response in cutaneous warts

Soobin Cha et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The utility of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of cutaneous warts is well known. However, its role in predicting the outcome of cryotherapy for cutaneous warts remains unexplored. To identify dermoscopic features predicting treatment responses in cryotherapy for cutaneous warts. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 119 warts in 103 patients. Responses were categorized as complete, partial, or none after three sessions of cryotherapy within 4 months. The evaluated features included vascularity, papillary patterns, and margin characteristics. Marked surface scales and well-defined margins were common in complete responses. Minimal surface scales and smooth patterns were observed in less responsive cases. In the group with a complete response, marked surface scales were observed 6.59 times more frequently, well-defined margins were 4.1 times more common, and dots were 4.07 times more common compared to the group with no response. Common warts responded well when showing vascularity and marked surface scales, whereas plantar warts responded positively when showing background erythema. Dermoscopic features, such as dots, marked surface scales, and well-defined margins, predict a favorable cryotherapy response in cutaneous warts. Plantar warts respond positively in the presence of perilesional erythema, whereas common warts exhibit vascularity and marked surface scales for a better response to cryotherapy.

Keywords: Cryotherapy; Dermoscopy; Human papilloma virus; Predictive factors; Viral infection; Warts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Informed consent: The study was a retrospective study that received IRB approval. At that time, the IRB determined that not only did it meet the following two requirements, but it was also included in the exemption from consent because sensitive information was not included in the study. Requirement 1: Obtaining consent from the research subjects is practically impossible during the course of the study or it is determined that it would seriously affect the validity of the research. Requirement 2: There is no reason to presume that the research subjects would refuse consent, and the exemption from consent poses extremely low risk to the research subjects. Institutional review board statement: Approved by the Institutional Review Board of Pusan National University Hospital Clinical Trial Center (IRB No.: H-2401–010-135).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Dermoscopic evaluation criteria of vascularity / surface scales in warts. (ac) Classification based on the degree of vascularity (a) dots (red arrow), (b) globules (blue arrow), (c) linear vessels (yellow arrow). (dh) Classification based on the degree of surface scales (d) unmarked, (e) smooth, (f) frogspawn, (g) finger-like projection, (h) papilliform pattern, (de) classified as ‘minimal surface scales’, (fh) classified as ‘marked surface scales’.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Dermoscopic evaluation criteria of margin definition and skin markings in warts (a) well-defined margin, (b) ill-defined margin, (c) interrupted skin makings, (d) continous skin markings.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Clinical and dermoscopic images of a patient from partial response groups (ab) pre-treatment images (cd) post-treatment images after completing three cryotherapy cycles.

References

    1. Zhu, P. et al. Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous warts. J. Evid. Based Med.15(4), 284–301. 10.1111/jebm.12423 (2022). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh, Y. The application of machine learning in predicting outcome of cryotherapy and immunotherapy for wart removal. Ann. Dermatol.33(4), 345–350. 10.5021/ad.2021.33.4.345 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khozeimeh, F. et al. An expert system for selecting wart treatment method. Comput. Biol. Med.81, 167–175. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.12.020 (2017). - PubMed
    1. Ghiasi, M. M. & Zendehboudi, S. Decision tree-based methodology to select a proper approach for wart treatment. Comput. Biol. Med.108, 400–409. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.05.002 (2019). - PubMed
    1. Al Rudaisat, M. & Cheng, H. Dermoscopy features of cutaneous warts. Int. J. Gen. Med.14, 9903–9912. 10.2147/IJGM.S329156 (2021). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources