Trust in family doctor-patient relations: an embeddedness theory perspective
- PMID: 39592971
- PMCID: PMC11590485
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20805-1
Trust in family doctor-patient relations: an embeddedness theory perspective
Abstract
Background: Based on the embeddedness theory, the present study aims to explore the association between patients' trust in family doctors (Interpersonal Trust), trust in community health centers (Organizational Trust), and trust in society as a whole (Social Trust).
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in six community health centers in China, using partial least squares structural equation modeling to assess trust scale reliability and validity while testing hypotheses.
Results: The scores of Interpersonal Trust, Organizational Trust, and Social Trust were 3.761, 3.636, and 3.635, respectively. Our findings confirm that Interpersonal Trust is positively associated with Organizational Trust (β = 0.916, p < 0.001), Organizational Trust is positively associated with Social Trust (β = 0.617, p < 0.001) and Interpersonal Trust (β = 0.864, p < 0.001), and Social Trust is positively associated with Organizational Trust (β = 0.784, p < 0.001). However, the relationship between Interpersonal Trust and Social Trust was not demonstrated.
Conclusions: This study enhances our understanding of patient trust in family doctors. Applying embeddedness theory, we reveal positive correlations between Social Trust and Organizational Trust, as well as between Organizational Trust and Interpersonal Trust. Moreover, we have identified Organizational Trust as a crucial mediator in the relationship between Interpersonal Trust and Social Trust.
Keywords: Embeddedness theory; Partial least squares structural equation model; Trust.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethics approval for this study was granted by the Medical Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. All participants provided informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study, and their participation was entirely voluntary. Participants were informed about the study’s objectives, procedures, potential risks, and their right to withdraw at any time without any consequences. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Sun C, Liu T, Jiang F, Si S, Chu S, Wang P. The development process and implementation of policies related to Family Doctor in China. Chin Gen Pract. 2021;24:765–74.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
