Vital lessons from struggling partnerships and potential partnerships: an international study with leaders across the health sector
- PMID: 39593025
- PMCID: PMC11590265
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11944-7
Vital lessons from struggling partnerships and potential partnerships: an international study with leaders across the health sector
Abstract
Background: Inter-organizational partnerships and collaborations, used here interchangeably, have growing prominence across the health sector. Successful partnerships have received extensive study. However, especially for partnerships including nonprofit partners, limited attention has been given to negative factors that contribute to struggling partnerships, including failed partnerships, and/or impede potential partnerships, including unexplored and undeveloped potential partnerships. This study aimed to explore these across diverse examples of struggling and potential partnerships considered otherwise worthwhile in principle, according to leaders and managers-in 13 countries across Asia-Pacific, EU+, North America-from diverse roles and settings across the health sector. It also aimed to explore success factors they said contributed to successful partnerships.
Methods: Interviews were conducted with 70 practitioners in 13 countries and a wide range of roles and nonprofit, industry, and government settings, including research institutions, across the health sector. Interviews covered their examples of struggling, potential, and successful partnerships; and, factors. Interview data were analyzed inductively, employing thematic network analysis. Comments underlying themes were reviewed regarding the participants concerned to note range (e.g., regions).
Results: Key findings included: (1) the many negative factors and success factors identified as themes; (2) their occurrence across diverse contexts, including different regions and institutional sectors (i.e., nonprofit, industry, government); (3) the complementarity of negative factors and success factors, with each set placing different emphasis on certain topics and negative factors both broadening the overall range of topics and contributing more to literature; (4) the occurrence of most negative factors with both struggling and potential partnerships. The 255 partnerships and potential partnerships discussed included nonprofit (190/255), industry (112/255), and/or government (140/255) partners. Many spanned two different institutional sectors (147/255); 86/255 spanned one; 20/255 spanned three.
Conclusions: The findings suggest three takeaways for practitioners: (1) factors used to consider partnerships should reflect factors from struggling partnerships and/or potential partnerships, plus successful partnerships; (2) negative factors can highlight opportunities to advance partnerships, individually and systematically; (3) practitioners should consider developing frameworks of factors from literature and experience to facilitate judicious consideration of partnerships and inform approaches, lessons drawn, and potential partnerships sought. Struggling and potential partnerships merit scholarly attention.
Keywords: Barriers and facilitators; Design; Health policy; Integrated care; Interorganizational collaboration; Intersectoral collaboration; OECD countries; Patient involvement; Population health; Product development.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The Seattle University institutional review board (IRB) found this study exempt from the need for IRB review (letter dated February 2, 2017). All methods in this study were carried out in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. Interviews were voluntary and confidential. Informed consent was obtained verbally at the start of each interview. With participants’ verbal consent, interviews conducted were audio-recorded for transcription or, on request, detailed notes were taken and no audio recorded. Participant information and quotes have been disguised and anonymized. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Building and Sustaining Effective Partnerships for Training the Next Generation of Global Health Leaders.Ann Glob Health. 2021 Jul 12;87(1):66. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3214. eCollection 2021. Ann Glob Health. 2021. PMID: 34307069 Free PMC article.
-
Public Health and Hospitals: Lessons Learned From Partnerships in a Changing Health Care Environment.Am J Public Health. 2016 Jan;106(1):45-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302938. Epub 2015 Nov 12. Am J Public Health. 2016. PMID: 26562110 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring opportunities for collaboration between the corporate sector and the dental education community.Eur J Dent Educ. 2008 Feb;12 Suppl 1:64-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2007.00481.x. Eur J Dent Educ. 2008. PMID: 18289269
-
Quality improvement in public-private partnerships in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10802-w. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38481226 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources