Reliability of range of motion in straight leg raise and hip extension tests among healthy young adults using a smartphone application
- PMID: 39593664
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.033
Reliability of range of motion in straight leg raise and hip extension tests among healthy young adults using a smartphone application
Abstract
Introduction: Measuring range of motion (ROM) is an important skill for clinicians because it can help in the accurate interpretation of a patient's condition. Recently, ROM tests using smartphone applications have been performed in clinical settings, with the tests demonstrating high reliability and validity. This study aimed to identify the usefulness of ROM tests conducted using smartphone applications by examining the reliability of straight leg raise (SLR) and hip extension (HE) tests.
Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included 72 lower limbs of 36 participants (19 men and 17 women; mean age, 21.6 ± 0.8 years). Passive SLR-ROM and HE-ROM were measured in 1° increments using an iPhone goniometer (IG). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). ROM test systematic error was confirmed using Bland-Altman analysis, and ROM measurement error was calculated.
Results: The ICCs of the IG ROM tests were 0.820 or higher. According to Bland-Altman analyses, SLR-ROM and HE-ROM did not acknowledge fixed and proportional biases. Thus, ROM measurement error was calculated as the minimal detectable change (MDC). The intra-rater and inter-rater MDC 95% confidence interval (MDC95) values of SLR-ROM were 3.3° and 10.2°, respectively. The intra-rater and inter-rater MDC95 values for HE-ROM were 3.9° and 9.6°, respectively.
Conclusion: IG ROM tests were highly reliable, simple, and easy to perform. SLR-ROM and HE-ROM tests conducted using smartphone applications may be useful indices for clinical decision-making.
Keywords: Clinical decision-making; Disability evaluation; Range of motion; Rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Reliability and concurrent validity of a new iPhone® goniometric application for measuring active wrist range of motion: a cross-sectional study in asymptomatic subjects.J Anat. 2017 Mar;230(3):484-495. doi: 10.1111/joa.12568. Epub 2016 Dec 2. J Anat. 2017. PMID: 27910103 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility, reliability and validity of self-measurement of knee range-of-motion using an accelerometer-based smartphone application by patients with total knee arthroplasty.PLoS One. 2024 Oct 3;19(10):e0307219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307219. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39361563 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability, Concurrent Validity, and Minimal Detectable Change for iPhone Goniometer App in Assessing Knee Range of Motion.J Knee Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):577-584. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593877. Epub 2016 Nov 28. J Knee Surg. 2017. PMID: 27894147 Clinical Trial.
-
Reliability and validity of smartphone applications to measure the spinal range of motion: A systematic review.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Sep;18(9):893-901. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1962290. Epub 2021 Aug 11. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021. PMID: 34334079
-
Reliability and validity of clinically accessible smartphone applications to measure joint range of motion: A systematic review.PLoS One. 2019 May 8;14(5):e0215806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215806. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31067247 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources