Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 20;14(22):3342.
doi: 10.3390/ani14223342.

Modulation of Canine Gut Microbiota by Prebiotic and Probiotic Supplements: A Long-Term In Vitro Study Using a Novel Colonic Fermentation Model

Affiliations

Modulation of Canine Gut Microbiota by Prebiotic and Probiotic Supplements: A Long-Term In Vitro Study Using a Novel Colonic Fermentation Model

Alessandro Gramenzi et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in dogs' health, influencing immune function, digestion, and protection against pathogens. This study evaluates the effects of three canine dietary supplements-Microbiotal (prebiotic), Lactobacillus reuteri (probiotic), and a combination of both-on the gut microbiota composition of a healthy canine donor using an in vitro colonic fermentation model. The SCIME™ platform, adapted to simulate the canine gastrointestinal tract, was used to monitor microbial shifts in the luminal and mucosal environments of the proximal and distal colon over a 2-week treatment period. The microbial communities were analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing to assess changes at various taxonomic levels. Alpha- and beta-diversity indices were calculated, while LEfSe and treeclimbR were employed to identify taxa-driving microbial shifts. Results indicated that all treatments led to significant modulations in key microbial groups, with enrichment of Limosilactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Prevotella, and Faecalibacterium. These changes suggest improved saccharolytic fermentation and butyrate production, particularly when prebiotics and probiotics were co-administered. This study highlights the promising benefits of combined prebiotic and probiotic supplementation in promoting gut health and microbial diversity, providing a basis for future studies targeting the metabolic activity of the gut microbiota using the same supplements and technology.

Keywords: canine gut microbiota; colonic fermentation model; microbial diversity; microbial shifts; prebiotic; probiotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

In accordance with the NBF Lanes policy and with the authors’ ethical obligation as researchers, A.G. and G.P. declare that they are consultants of the company and act following the recommendations on good publication practices to ensure ethical and transparent editorial practices.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standard setup of the Simulator of the Canine Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SCIME™), consisting of four sequential reactors, simulating the different canine gastrointestinal tract regions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Modified version of the SCIME into a Triple-M-SCIME used for the current study. St + SI: vessel serving as stomach and small intestine, PC: proximal colon, and DC: distal colon.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) on alpha diversity as calculated using four different measures (observed (count of unique taxa in each sample), Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) in the luminal proximal colon (PC) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period. Three samples (A, B, C) were collected during each period, represented by different colors.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) on alpha diversity as calculated using four different measures (observed (count of unique taxa in each sample), Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) in the luminal distal colon (DC) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period. Three samples (A, B, C) were collected during each period, represented by different colors.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) on alpha diversity as calculated using four different measures (observed (count of unique taxa in each sample), Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) in the mucosal proximal colon (PC) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period. Three samples (A, B, C) were collected during each period, represented by different colors.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect of treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) on alpha diversity as calculated using four different measures (observed (count of unique taxa in each sample), Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) in the mucosal distal colon (DC) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period. Three samples (A, B, C) were collected during each period, represented by different colors.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) to show differences in community composition (beta diversity) in the luminal proximal colon (PC) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P). Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3). Each dot represents one sample.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) to show differences in community composition (beta diversity) in the luminal distal colon (DC) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P). Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3). Each dot represents one sample.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) to show differences in community composition (beta diversity) in the mucosal proximal colon (PC) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P). Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3). Each dot represents one sample.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) to show differences in community composition (beta diversity) in the mucosal distal colon (DC) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P). Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3). Each dot represents one sample.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Jitter plots showing abundances of different phyla in the luminal proximal colon (PC) following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period based on absolute levels. Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3).
Figure 12
Figure 12
Jitter plots showing abundances of different phyla in the luminal distal colon (DC) following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period based on absolute levels. Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3).
Figure 13
Figure 13
Jitter plots showing abundances of different phyla in the mucosal proximal colon (PC) following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period based on relative abundances. Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3).
Figure 14
Figure 14
Jitter plots showing abundances of different phyla in the mucosal distal colon (DC) following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period based on relative abundances. Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3).
Figure 15
Figure 15
Jitter plots showing abundances of the 20 most abundant families in the luminal proximal colon (PC) following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period based on absolute levels. Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3).
Figure 16
Figure 16
Jitter plots showing abundances of the 20 most abundant families in the luminal distal colon (DC) following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period based on absolute levels. Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3).
Figure 17
Figure 17
Jitter plots showing abundances of the 20 most abundant families in the mucosal proximal colon (PC) following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period based on relative abundances. Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3).
Figure 18
Figure 18
Jitter plots showing abundances of the 20 most abundant families in the mucosal distal colon (DC) following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period based on relative abundances. Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3).
Figure 19
Figure 19
Jitter plots showing abundances of the 20 most abundant genera in the luminal proximal colon (PC) following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period based on absolute levels. Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3).
Figure 20
Figure 20
Jitter plots showing abundances of the 20 most abundant genera in the luminal distal colon (DC) following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period based on absolute levels. Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3).
Figure 21
Figure 21
Jitter plots showing abundances of the 20 most abundant genera in the mucosal proximal colon (PC) following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period based on relative abundances. Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3).
Figure 22
Figure 22
Jitter plots showing abundances of the 20 most abundant genera in the mucosal distal colon (DC) following treatment with the different test products (Microbiotal, M; probiotic, P; and their combination, M + P) at the end of the control (CTRL) and treatment (TR) period based on relative abundances. Each color represents one of six categories (groups), i.e., CTRL_M (n = 3), TR_M (n = 3), CTRL_P (n = 3), TR_P (n = 3), CTRL_M + P (n = 3), and TR_M + P (n = 3).

References

    1. Swanson K., Suchodolski J., Turnbaugh P. Companion animal symposium: Microbes and health. J. Anim. Sci. 2011;89:1496–1497. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-3873. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suchodolski J. Intestinal microbiota of dogs and cats: A bigger world than we thought. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2011;41:261–272. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2010.12.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sekirov I., Russell S.L., Antunes L.C., Finlay B.B. Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 2010;90:859–904. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suchodolski J. Companion Animals Symposium: Microbes and gastrointestinal health of dogs and cats1. J. Anim. Sci. 2011;89:1520–1530. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3377. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim J., An J., Kim W., Lee S., Cho S. Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumia MiSeq platform. Gut Pathog. 2017;9:68. doi: 10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources