Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 19;25(22):12401.
doi: 10.3390/ijms252212401.

Rhodanine-Piperazine Hybrids as Potential VEGFR, EGFR, and HER2 Targeting Anti-Breast Cancer Agents

Affiliations

Rhodanine-Piperazine Hybrids as Potential VEGFR, EGFR, and HER2 Targeting Anti-Breast Cancer Agents

Jacek Szczepański et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies affecting women worldwide, with a significant need for novel therapeutic agents to target specific molecular pathways involved in tumor progression. In this study, a series of rhodanine-piperazine hybrids were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for their anticancer activity, targeting key tyrosine kinases such as VEGFR, EGFR, and HER2. Biological screening against breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, T47D, and MDA-MB-468) revealed 3 of the 13 tested compounds as the most potent, with 5-({4-[bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl]piperazin-1-yl}methylidene)-2-thioxo-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (12) showing the strongest activity, particularly against the MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 cell lines. Molecular docking studies indicated favorable binding interactions of compound 12 and its 3-phenyl-2-thioxo-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one analogue (15) with HER2, VEGFR, and EGFR, and molecular dynamics simulations further confirmed their stable binding to HER2. These findings highlight the potential of rhodanine-piperazine hybrids as promising leads for developing new anticancer agents targeting breast cancer, particularly HER2-positive subtypes. Further structural optimization could enhance their efficacy and therapeutic profile.

Keywords: EGFR; HER2; VEGFR; anti-breast cancer activity; molecular docking; rhodanine–piperazine hybrids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Design of new rhodanine–piperazine hybrids. Abbreviations: HBA—hydrogen bond acc−eptor; HBD—hydrogen bond donor; and Ar—aryl.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of kinase inhibitors containing a piperazine ring and used as anti-breast cancer drugs.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Synthesis of rhodanine–piperazine hybrids (517). Reagents and conditions: (i) HCl at r.t., then 90 °C, 5 min; (ii) KOH, 0–5 °C; (iii) ClCH2COOK, 0–5 °C; HCl, 90 °C, 5 min; (iv) Ac2O, reflux, 3 h; (v) anhydrous ethanol, reflux, 30 min.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bioavailability radar for rhodanine–piperazine hybrids (517). The pink area represents the optimal range for each of the properties (lipophilicity: XLOGP3 between −0.7 and +5.0, size: M between 150 and 500 g/mol, polarity: TPSA between 20 and 130 Å2, solubility: log S not higher than six, saturation: fraction of carbons in the sp3 hybridization not less than 0.25, and flexibility: no more than nine rotatable bonds).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The structure–activity relationship of the tested rhodanine–piperazine hybrids against breast cancer cell lines.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The 3D and 2D schemes of the HER2–compound 12 complex.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The 3D and 2D schemes of the HER2–compound 15 complex.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The comparison of the RMSD values for the 12, 15, and Tak-285 complexes with HER2 (PDB 3RCD).
Figure 8
Figure 8
The calculated average RMSF for HER2 complexes with 12, 15, and Tak-285.
Figure 9
Figure 9
The number of hydrogen bonds during the simulation for complexes of HER2 with 15, Tak-285, and 12.
Figure 10
Figure 10
The Rg values for 15, Tak-285, and 12 complexes with HER2.

References

    1. Arnold M., Morgan E., Rumgay H., Mafra A., Laversanne M., Vignat J., Gralow J.R., Cardoso F., Singh D., Siesling S., et al. Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast. 2022;66:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO Breast Cancer. Fact Sheets, WHO, Geneva. 2024. [(accessed on 12 October 2024)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer.
    1. Harbeck N., Penault-Llorca F., Cortes J., Gnant M., Houssami N., Poortmans P., Ruddy K., Tsang J., Cardoso F. Breast cancer. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2019;5:66. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Recondo G., Facchinetti F., Olaussen K.A., Besse B., Friboulet L. Making the first move in EGFR-driven or ALK-driven NSCLC: First-generation or next-generation TKI? Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018;15:694–708. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0081-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yun C.H., Mengwasser K.E., Toms A.V., Woo M.S., Greulich H., Wong K.K., Meyerson M., Eck M.J. The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:2070–2075. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709662105. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms