Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 15;12(11):2334.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12112334.

Live Multi-Strain Probiotics Enhance Growth Performance by Regulating Intestinal Morphology and Microbiome Population in Weaning Piglets

Affiliations

Live Multi-Strain Probiotics Enhance Growth Performance by Regulating Intestinal Morphology and Microbiome Population in Weaning Piglets

Chao-Wei Huang et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

The effects of different forms of multi-strain probiotics on weaning piglets are limitedly addressed. Thus, this study investigated the effects of live or inanimate multi-strain probiotics comprising Lactobacillus plantarum, Streptococcus thermophilus, and Bacillus subtilis on growth performance, intestinal morphology, fecal microbiota, short-chain fatty acids, and intestinal gene expression of weaning piglets. A total of 160 weaning piglets (4 weeks old) were randomly allocated into four treatments (CON: basal diet; AB: basal diet with 110 ppm and 66 ppm colistin in the weaning and nursery phases, respectively; LP: basal diet with 2.0 × 109 CFU/kg live probiotics; and IP: basal diet with 2.0 × 109 CFU/kg inanimate probiotics). Piglets fed with LP had significantly lower FCR compared to those of the CON and IP groups in week 4 to week 8 (p < 0.05). Moreover, the LP group had significantly higher villus height (VH) compared with AB at week 6, lower crypt depth (CD) compared with IP, and higher VH/CD ratio compared to other treatments at week 10 (p < 0.05), which indicate healthier intestinal morphology. Probiotic treatments (LP and IP) increased Bifidobacterium population compared to CON at week 6 and lowered Enterobacteriaceae at week 6 and week 10 (p < 0.05). Regarding gene expressions of intestinal integrity, LP showed significantly higher TFF3 expression compared with CON and AB at week 6 and compared with other treatments in jejunum at week 10 (p < 0.05). IP treatment had significantly higher MUC2 expression compared to other treatments at week 6 and week 10 (p < 0.05). Overall, live multi-strain probiotics improved growth efficiency by enhancing gut integrity and microbiome balance, making them a potential antibiotic alternative to ameliorate weaning stress and promote productive performance in weaning piglets.

Keywords: gene expression; growth performance; intestinal integrity; probiotics; weaning piglets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors Ting-Yu Lee, Hsiao-Tung Chang, Hsiao-Ching Lin, Hsiu-Ming Weng, Hsin-Hsuan Huang, and Jin-Seng Lin were employed by SYNBIO TECH Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histological representations of intestinal samples (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) from experimental pigs at week 6 (A) and week 10 (B) (scale bar = 250 µm). CON, piglets were fed with basal diet; AB, piglets were fed with basal diet containing 110 ppm colistin in the weaning phase and 66 ppm colistin in the nursery phase; LP and IP, piglets were fed with basal diet containing 2.0 × 109 CFU/kg live and inanimate multi-strain probiotics containing L. plantarum, S. thermophilus, and B. subtilis, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of live or inanimate multi-strain probiotics on relative gene expression of weaning pigs. *, **, and *** indicate that means are significant difference among each other at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively, which are statistically tested by Kruskal–Wallis test. (A) TFF2, Trefoil factor 2; (B) TFF3, Trefoil factor 3; (C) MUC2, Mucin 2; (D) ZO1, Zonula occludens-1; (E) Claudin 1; and (F) Occludin. CON, piglets were fed with basal diet; AB, piglets were fed with basal diet containing 110 ppm colistin in the weaning phase and 66 ppm colistin in the nursery phase; LP and IP, piglets were fed with basal diet containing 2.0 × 109 CFU/kg live and inanimate multi-strain probiotics containing L. plantarum, S. thermophilus, and B. subtilis, respectively.

References

    1. Rhouma M., Fairbrother J.M., Beaudry F., Letellier A. Post weaning diarrhea in pigs: Risk factors and non-colistin-based control strategies. Acta Vet. Scand. 2017;59:31. doi: 10.1186/s13028-017-0299-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cremonesi P., Biscarini F., Castiglioni B., Sgoifo C.A., Compiani R., Moroni P. Gut microbiome modifications over time when removing in-feed antibiotics from the prophylaxis of post-weaning diarrhea in piglets. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0262199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262199. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lallès J.-P., Boudry G., Favier C., Le Floc’h N., Luron I., Montagne L., Oswald I.P., Pié S., Piel C., Sève B. Gut function and dysfunction in young pigs: Physiology. Anim. Res. 2004;53:301–316. doi: 10.1051/animres:2004018. - DOI
    1. McCracken B.A., Spurlock M.E., Roos M.A., Zuckermann F.A., Gaskins H.R. Weaning anorexia may contribute to local inflammation in the piglet small intestine. J. Nutr. 1999;129:613–619. doi: 10.1093/jn/129.3.613. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Breda L.K., Dhungyel O.P., Ginn A.N., Iredell J.R., Ward M.P. Pre- and post-weaning scours in southeastern Australia: A survey of 22 commercial pig herds and characterisation of Escherichia coli isolates. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0172528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172528. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources