Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov 8;13(22):6737.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13226737.

Methodological Considerations for Studies Evaluating Bleeding Prediction Using Hemostatic Point-of-Care Tests in Cardiac Surgery

Affiliations
Review

Methodological Considerations for Studies Evaluating Bleeding Prediction Using Hemostatic Point-of-Care Tests in Cardiac Surgery

Mirna Petricevic et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

A certain proportion of patients undergoing cardiac surgery may experience bleeding complications that worsen outcomes. Numerous studies have investigated bleeding in cardiac surgery and some evaluate the role of hemostatic point-of-care tests in cardiac surgery patients. The prevalence of excessive bleeding varies in the literature, and such variability stems from the lack of a standardized definition of excessive bleeding. Herein, we report numerous definitions of excessive bleeding and methodological considerations for studies evaluating bleeding using hemostatic point-of-care tests in cardiac surgery patients. We evaluated the role of hemostatic point-of-care devices in contemporary research on bleeding complications and hemostatic management in cardiac surgery. The type of studies (prospective vs. retrospective, interventional vs. observational), patient selection (less complex vs. complex cases), as well as data analysis with comprehensive statistical considerations have also been provided. This article provides a comprehensive insight into the research field of bleeding complications in cardiac surgery and may help readers to better understand methodological flaws and how they influence current evidence.

Keywords: bleeding; cardiac surgery; chest tube output; transfusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Methodological considerations for studies with respect to intervention and timeline.

References

    1. Nielsen V.G. Coagulation crystal ball: Why can’t we predict bleeding after cardiac surgery? Anesth. Analg. 2012;115:490–492. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318261f425. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carroll R.C., Chavez J.J., Snider C.C., Meyer D.S., Muenchen R.A. Correlation of perioperative platelet function and coagulation tests with bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2006;147:197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.lab.2005.12.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kristensen K.L., Rauer L.J., Mortensen P.E., Kjeldsen B.J. Reoperation for bleeding in cardiac surgery. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2012;14:709–713. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs050. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johansson P.I., Solbeck S., Genet G., Stensballe J., Ostrowski S.R. Coagulopathy and hemostatic monitoring in cardiac surgery: An update. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 2012;46:194–202. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2012.671487. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dixon B., Santamaria J.D., Reid D., Collins M., Rechnitzer T., Newcomb A.E., Nixon I., Yii M., Rosalion A., Campbell D.J. The association of blood transfusion with mortality after cardiac surgery: Cause or confounding? (CME) Transfusion. 2013;53:19–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03697.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources