Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov 20;13(22):6997.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13226997.

Physical Activity Measurement in People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Comparative Review of Different Questionnaires

Affiliations
Review

Physical Activity Measurement in People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Comparative Review of Different Questionnaires

Joan Úbeda-Colomer et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) provides great health benefits for people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Consequently, the design and implementation of PA interventions addressed to this population is needed. To rigorously evaluate these interventions, the use of valid and comprehensive PA measures is crucial. Since the suitability of PA assessment tools might differ among different populations, and considering that questionnaires are one of the most frequently used tools to quantify PA, the purpose of this comparative review was to examine nine questionnaires that have been used to assess PA in people with SCI. All the questionnaires were analyzed in depth in regard to three main dimensions: (1) SCI-specific development; (2) PA domains measured and PA intensity classification; and (3) reliability and validity. After careful consideration of the evidence available on all these aspects, it is suggested that the most suitable questionnaires to be used in PA research in the SCI population are the PARA-SCI and the LTPAQ-SCI[R]. To conclude, the strengths and limitations of these two questionnaires are discussed, and specific recommendations to SCI researchers and practitioners regarding the suitability, according to the context and characteristics, of the research/intervention are provided.

Keywords: physical activity assessment; reliability; self-report questionnaires; spinal cord injury; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. World Health Organization. International Spinal Cord Society . International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2013. 231p
    1. Noreau L., Proulx P., Gagnon L., Drolet M., Laramée M.T. Secondary impairments after spinal cord injury: A population-based study. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2000;79:526–535. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200011000-00009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Majamäki K., Tallqvist S., Vainionpää A., Koskinen E., Kauppila A.-M., Bergman P., Anttila H., Hämäläinen H., Täckman A., Kallinen M., et al. Functional independence in the Finnish spinal cord injury population. Spinal Cord. 2022;60:628–634. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00700-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lund M.L., Nordlund A., Bernspång B., Lexell J. Perceived participation and problems in participation are determinants of life satisfaction in people with spinal cord injury. Disabil. Rehabil. 2007;29:1417–1422. doi: 10.1080/09638280601029068. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonanno G.A., Kennedy P., Galatzer-Levy I.R., Lude P., Elfström M.L. Trajectories of resilience, depression, and anxiety following spinal cord injury. Rehabil. Psychol. 2012;57:236–247. doi: 10.1037/a0029256. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources