Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov 14;14(11):1485.
doi: 10.3390/life14111485.

Impact of Gut Microbiome Interventions on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Metabolic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Impact of Gut Microbiome Interventions on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Metabolic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Alexandra Laura Mederle et al. Life (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The gut microbiome is increasingly recognized as a key player in metabolic health, influencing glucose and lipid metabolism through various mechanisms. However, the efficacy of gut microbiota-targeted interventions, such as probiotics, prebiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and diet-based treatments, remains unclear for specific metabolic outcomes. In this study, the aim was to evaluate the impact of these interventions on the glucose and lipid parameters in individuals with metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, and metabolic syndrome.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 41 randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of gut microbiota-targeted treatments on metabolic parameters such as fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides. A comprehensive search was conducted using databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus, focusing on interventions targeting the gut microbiota. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models, with effect sizes calculated for each outcome. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

Results: Gut microbiota-targeted interventions significantly reduced fasting glucose, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, total cholesterol, LDL-C, and triglycerides, with moderate heterogeneity observed across studies. The interventions also led to modest increases in HDL-C levels. Probiotic and synbiotic interventions showed the most consistent benefits in improving both glucose and lipid profiles, while FMT yielded mixed results. Short-term interventions showed rapid microbial shifts but less pronounced metabolic improvements, whereas longer-term interventions had more substantial metabolic benefits.

Conclusions: In this study, it is demonstrated that gut microbiota-targeted interventions can improve key metabolic outcomes, offering a potential therapeutic strategy for managing metabolic diseases. However, the effectiveness of these interventions varies depending on the type, duration, and population characteristics, highlighting the need for further long-term studies to assess the sustained effects of microbiota modulation on metabolic health.

Keywords: FMT; glucose metabolism; gut microbiome; gut microbiome intervention; lipid metabolism; personalized medicine; prebiotic; probiotic; symbiotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
This forest plot visualizes the effect of various interventions on HbA1c levels across multiple studies. The fewer data points are due to incomplete data or exclusion based on heterogeneity concerns or quality issues in some studies, thus only the studies with sufficient data for reliable analysis are included. The blue points represent each study’s effect size on HbA1c, with gray error bars showing the 95% confidence intervals. If the error bars cross the stripped line, the result is not statistically significant for that study.
Figure 3
Figure 3
This forest plot visualizes the effect of various interventions on triglyceride levels across multiple studies. The fewer data points are due to incomplete data or exclusion based on heterogeneity concerns or quality issues in some studies, thus only the studies with sufficient data for reliable analysis are included. The blue points represent each study’s effect size on triglycerides, with gray error bars showing the 95% confidence intervals. If the error bars cross the stripped line, the result is not statistically significant for that study.

References

    1. Hou K., Wu Z.X., Chen X.Y., Wang J.Q., Zhang D., Xiao C., Zhu D., Koya J.B., Wei L., Li J., et al. Microbiota in Health and Diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022;7:135. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fan Y., Pedersen O. Gut Microbiota in Human Metabolic Health and Disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021;19:55–71. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0433-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Magne F., Gotteland M., Gauthier L., Zazueta A., Pesoa S., Navarrete P., Balamurugan R. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio: A Relevant Marker of Gut Dysbiosis in Obese Patients? Nutrients. 2020;12:1474. doi: 10.3390/nu12051474. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van de Vyver M. Immunology of Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation: Relationship with Metabolic Function. J. Endocrinol. 2023;257:e220271. doi: 10.1530/JOE-22-0271. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Utzschneider K.M., Kratz M., Damman C.J., Hullar M. Mechanisms Linking the Gut Microbiome and Glucose Metabolism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016;101:1445–1454. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-4251. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources