Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 15;29(22):5396.
doi: 10.3390/molecules29225396.

Covalent vs. Dative Bonding in Carbon Monoxide and Other 10-Valence-Electron Diatomics

Affiliations

Covalent vs. Dative Bonding in Carbon Monoxide and Other 10-Valence-Electron Diatomics

Khadija Rizwan et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Valence bond theory (VB) was used to determine the extent and driving forces for covalent vs. dative bonding in 10-valence-electron diatomic molecules N2, CO, NO+, CN-, P2, SiS, PS+, and SiP-. VBSCF calculations were performed at the CCSD(T)/cc-pVDZ optimized geometries. The full triply bonded system included 20 VB structures. A separation of the σ and π space allowed for a subdivision of the full 20 structure set into sets of 8 and 3 for the π and σ systems, respectively. The smaller structure sets allowed for a more focused look at each type of bond. In situ bond energies for σ bonds, individual π bonds, the π system, and triple bonds follow expected trends. Our data shows that N2 and P2 have three covalent bonds whereas CO and SiS contain two covalent and one dative bond, and charged species NO+, CN-, PS+, and SiP- are a mixture of N2 and CO type electronic arrangements, resulting in a nearly equal charge distribution. Dative bonds prefer to be in the π position due to enhanced σ covalency and π resonance. Both σ and π resonance energies depend on a balance of ionic strength, orbital compactness, σ constraints, and bond directionality. Resonance energy is a major contributor to bond strength, making up more than 50% of the π bonds in SiS and PS+ (charge-shift bonds), and is greater than charge transfer in dative bonds.

Keywords: charge-shift bonding; dative bonds; resonance energy; valence bond theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Lewis-type structural representations of carbon monoxide. In (a) octet rule is followed but negative formal charge resides on the more electronegative O atom. Structure (b) reduces formal charge but violate octet rule. Structure (c) uses arrow notation to indicate a dative bond.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A subset of the 20 structures used in the present work. For mixed diatomics, B is the more electronegative atom. Structure 1 is the covalent (spin-paired) structure for both σ and π bonds, structures 2 and 3 are the σ ionic structures, and structures 4 and 5 are the ionic structures for the πx bond. The πy bond has structures similar to 4 and 5 in the zy-plane.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Non-bonded determinants with dative electrons in the σ (a) and π (b) positions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Lewis-type structural representation of CO indicating the resonance of dative bonds in the π position.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Valence bond descriptions of (a) covalent and (b) dative bonds. In the covalent case (a), the spin-paired state, fcov(A−B), is low in energy and electronically neutral. In this case, A is more electronegative than B, resulting in ϕion 1 (A: B+) being lower in energy than ϕion 2 (A+ :B). In the dative case (b), species B donates both electrons to the bond, resulting in ϕdat being the low energy/electronically neutral structure while the spin-paired structure, ϕion 1, carries charge.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Quasiclassical determination of in situ energy of a 2-electron bond.

References

    1. Tietz N.W., Fiereck E.A. The spectrophotometric measurement of carboxyhemoglobin. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 1973;3:36–42. - PubMed
    1. Kester M., Karpa K.D., Vrana K.E. 3—Toxicology. In: Kester M., Karpa K.D., Vrana K.E., editors. Elsevier’s Integrated Review Pharmacology. 2nd ed. W.B. Saunders; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 2012. pp. 29–39.
    1. Nelson D.L., Cox M.M. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. Macmillan Higher Education; London, UK: 2017.
    1. Dewar M.J.S. A review of the π-complex theory. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1951;18:C79.
    1. Chatt J., Duncanson L.A. 586. Olefin co-ordination compounds. Part III. Infra-red spectra and structure: Attempted preparation of acetylene complexes. J. Chem. Soc. Resumed. 1953:2939–2947. doi: 10.1039/jr9530002939. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources