Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 5;24(22):7105.
doi: 10.3390/s24227105.

Validation of a 3D Markerless Motion Capture Tool Using Multiple Pose and Depth Estimations for Quantitative Gait Analysis

Affiliations

Validation of a 3D Markerless Motion Capture Tool Using Multiple Pose and Depth Estimations for Quantitative Gait Analysis

Mathis D'Haene et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Gait analysis is essential for evaluating walking patterns and identifying functional limitations. Traditional marker-based motion capture tools are costly, time-consuming, and require skilled operators. This study evaluated a 3D Marker-less Motion Capture (3D MMC) system using pose and depth estimations with the gold-standard Motion Capture (MOCAP) system for measuring hip and knee joint angles during gait at three speeds (0.7, 1.0, 1.3 m/s). Fifteen healthy participants performed gait tasks which were captured by both systems. The 3D MMC system demonstrated good accuracy (LCC > 0.96) and excellent inter-session reliability (RMSE < 3°). However, moderate-to-high accuracy with constant biases was observed during specific gait events, due to differences in sample rates and kinematic methods. Limitations include the use of only healthy participants and limited key points in the pose estimation model. The 3D MMC system shows potential as a reliable tool for gait analysis, offering enhanced usability for clinical and research applications.

Keywords: 3D markerless motion capture; depth estimation; pose estimation; quantitative gait analysis; stereoscopic cameras.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 3
Figure 3
Hip and knee flexion/extension angle waveforms at 1.0 m/s. The average gait cycle waveforms with standard deviation of the 15 participants for 3D MMC (blue) and MOCAP (red) are represented. The associated RMSE and LCC values are indicated. (a) Without offset removed; (b) offset removed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Hip and knee flexion/extension angle waveforms at 1.0 m/s. The average gait cycle waveforms with standard deviation of the 15 participants for 3D MMC (blue) and MOCAP (red) are represented. The associated RMSE and LCC values are indicated. (a) Without offset removed; (b) offset removed.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bland–Altman plots for hip and knee flexion/extension ROM at 1.0 m/s, offset removed. The mean differences are represented (red) along with the 95% limit of agreement (green).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Rizzoli body markerset for OptiTrack (32 Markers).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hip and knee flexion/extension angles waveforms of the 3D Markerless Motion Capture (3D MMC) system at 1.0 m/s. The average gait cycle waveforms with standard deviation of the 15 participants for gait session 1 (blue) and gait session 2 (red) are represented. The associated RMSE values are indicated.

References

    1. Christopher A., Kraft E., Olenick H., Kiesling R., Doty A. The Reliability and Validity of the Timed up and Go as a Clinical Tool in Individuals with and without Disabilities across a Lifespan: A Systematic Review: Psychometric Properties of the Timed up and Go. Disabil. Rehabil. 2021;43:1799–1813. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1682066. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rikli R.E., Jones C.J. The Reliability and Validity of a 6-Minute Walk Test as a Measure of Physical Endurance in Older Adults. J. Aging Phys. Act. 1998;6:363–375. doi: 10.1123/japa.6.4.363. - DOI
    1. Benedetti M., Agostini V., Knaflitz M., Gasparroni V., Boschi M., Piperno R. Self-Reported Gait Unsteadiness in Mildly Impaired Neurological Patients: An Objective Assessment through Statistical Gait Analysis. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2012;9:64. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-64. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nebel M.B., Sims E.L., Keefe F.J., Kraus V.B., Guilak F., Caldwell D.S., Pells J.J., Queen R., Schmitt D. The Relationship of Self-Reported Pain and Functional Impairment to Gait Mechanics in Overweight and Obese Persons With Knee Osteoarthritis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2009;90:1874–1879. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dierick F., Stoffel P.-L., Schütz G., Buisseret F. High Specificity of Single Inertial Sensor-Supplemented Timed up and Go Test for Assessing Fall Risk in Elderly Nursing Home Residents. Sensors. 2022;22:2339. doi: 10.3390/s22062339. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources