Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 8;24(22):7180.
doi: 10.3390/s24227180.

Evaluating the User Experience and Usability of the MINI Robot for Elderly Adults with Mild Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Insights and Recommendations

Affiliations

Evaluating the User Experience and Usability of the MINI Robot for Elderly Adults with Mild Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Insights and Recommendations

Aysan Mahmoudi Asl et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, the integration of robotic systems into various aspects of daily life has become increasingly common. As these technologies continue to advance, ensuring user-friendly interfaces and seamless interactions becomes more essential. For social robots to genuinely provide lasting value to humans, a favourable user experience (UX) emerges as an essential prerequisite. This article aimed to evaluate the usability of the MINI robot, highlighting its strengths and areas for improvement based on user feedback and performance. Materials and Methods: In a controlled lab setting, a mixed-method qualitative study was conducted with ten individuals aged 65 and above diagnosed with mild dementia (MD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Participants engaged in individual MINI robot interaction sessions, completing cognitive tasks as per written instructions. Video and audio recordings documented interactions, while post-session System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaires quantified usability perception. Ethical guidelines were followed, ensuring informed consent, and the data underwent qualitative and quantitative analyses, contributing insights into the MINI robot's usability for this demographic. Results: The study addresses the ongoing challenges that tasks present, especially for MD individuals, emphasizing the importance of user support. Most tasks require both verbal and physical interactions, indicating that MD individuals face challenges when switching response methods within subtasks. These complexities originate from the selection and use of response methods, including difficulties with voice recognition, tablet touch, and tactile sensors. These challenges persist across tasks, with individuals with MD struggling to comprehend task instructions and provide correct answers and individuals with MCI struggling to use response devices, often due to the limitations of the robot's speech recognition. Technical shortcomings have been identified. The results of the SUS indicate positive perceptions, although there are lower ratings for instructor assistance and pre-use learning. The average SUS score of 68.3 places device usability in the "good" category. Conclusions: Our study examines the usability of the MINI robot, revealing strengths in quick learning, simple system and operation, and integration of features, while also highlighting areas for improvement. Careful design and modifications are essential for meaningful engagement with people with dementia. The robot could better benefit people with MD and MCI if clear, detailed instructions and instructor assistance were available.

Keywords: dementia; mild cognitive impairments; social robots; usability; user experience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest was declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MINI robot components.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MINI robot apps categorized: blue for general categories, purple for entertainment types, and orange for specific activities within each.
Figure 3
Figure 3
SUS score for each Item.

Similar articles

References

    1. Henschel A., Laban G., Cross E.S. What Makes a Robot Social? A Review of Social Robots from Science Fiction to a Home or Hospital Near You. Curr. Robot. Rep. 2021;2:9–19. doi: 10.1007/s43154-020-00035-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerłowska J., Skrobas U., Grabowska-Aleksandrowicz K., Korchut A., Szklener S., Szczęśniak-Stańczyk D., Tzovaras D., Rejdak K. Assessment of Perceived Attractiveness, Usability, and Societal Impact of a Multimodal Robotic Assistant for Aging Patients With Memory Impairments. Front. Neurol. 2018;9:392. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00392. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amanatiadis A., Kaburlasos V.G., Dardani C., Chatzichristofis S.A. Interactive social robots in special education; Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 7th International Conference on Consumer Electronics-Berlin (ICCE-Berlin); Berlin, Germany. 3–6 September 2017.
    1. Shourmasti E.S., Colomo-Palacios R., Holone H., Demi S. User Experience in Social Robots. Sensors. 2021;21:5052. doi: 10.3390/s21155052. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reich-Stiebert N., Eyssel F. Learning with Educational Companion Robots? Toward Attitudes on Education Robots, Predictors of Attitudes, and Application Potentials for Education Robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2015;7:875–888. doi: 10.1007/s12369-015-0308-9. - DOI