Method to Generate Chlorine Dioxide Gas In Situ for Sterilization of Automated Incubators
- PMID: 39599577
- PMCID: PMC11597574
- DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13111024
Method to Generate Chlorine Dioxide Gas In Situ for Sterilization of Automated Incubators
Erratum in
-
Correction: Schicklin et al. Method to Generate Chlorine Dioxide Gas In Situ for Sterilization of Automated Incubators. Pathogens 2024, 13, 1024.Pathogens. 2025 Apr 9;14(4):368. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14040368. Pathogens. 2025. PMID: 40333175 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Pharmaceutical preclinical tests using cell cultures are nowadays commonly automated. Incubator microbial contaminations impact such tests. Chlorine dioxide (ClO2) is widely used in aqueous solutions. However, a gaseous form, such as chlorine dioxide gas (gClO2), can effectively access unreachable spaces, such as closed cell culture incubators. Steam sterilization requires a temperature rise to at least 121 °C, thus limiting the possibility of automation elements for sensors and actuators. gClO2 sterilization is an ambient-temperature sterilization method. This article aims to demonstrate that gClO2 generated from solid powder tablets is efficient for sterilizing incubators and can be automated. We selected (i) Bacillus subtilis strain, (ii) Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and (iii) T7 phages as representatives for (i) bacteria, (ii) fungi, and (iii) viruses for each domain to evaluate the sterilization efficiency. This study demonstrated that gClO2 can be generated inside the incubator from a solid powder tablet without specific equipment and can effectively fight biological proxies in 15 min. After 30 sterilization cycles, the actuators and sensors mounted inside the incubator were still operating. Our proposed sterilization method seems to be generally applicable for automated in situ sterilization of incubators and medical robots.
Keywords: bacteria; chlorine dioxide; decontamination; fungi; viruses.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that this study was partially funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. However, the funding organization had no role in the design of the study, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors affirm that the integrity of the research and the objectivity of the findings were maintained throughout the study according to the University of Basel code of conduct (
Figures
References
-
- Probst C., Schneider S., Loskill P. High-throughput organ-on-a-chip systems: Current status and remaining challenges. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 2018;6:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cobme.2018.02.004. - DOI
-
- Malik P., Mukherjee S., Mukherjee T.K. Microbial contamination of mammalian cell culture. Pract. Approach Mamm. Cell Organ Cult. 2023:187–231. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-1731-8_5-1. - DOI
-
- Tang Y., Wu Y.H., Wang H.B., Chen Z., Wang W.L., Ni X.Y., Hu H.Y. Disinfection-residual bacteria (DRB) after chlorine dioxide treatment: Microbial community structure, regrowth potential, and secretion characteristics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024;476:135136. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135136. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
