Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;38(1):e13395.
doi: 10.1111/jhn.13395.

Content accuracy and readability of dietary advice available on webpages: A systematic review of the evidence

Affiliations

Content accuracy and readability of dietary advice available on webpages: A systematic review of the evidence

Evaggelia Fappa et al. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Concerns have been raised regarding the quality of health information published on the World Wide Web, while studies accumulating similar evidence for nutrition-related information are scarce. The present review aimed to systematically accumulate and discuss the findings of studies evaluating the content quality of websites publishing nutrition-related information, based on the PRISMA statement.

Methods: Studies that have assessed the accuracy and readability of dietary advice published on websites/webpages were evaluated. The SPIDER framework was used for the systematic search of studies, and those that evaluated websites/webpages that did not contain nutritional information, were videos or social media, referred to health professionals, or contained information on a specific theme (e.g., dietary supplements), were excluded.

Results: Twenty-nine studies were included in this review, assessing information, published mainly in English, on 18 different diet-related topics. Twenty of them classified websites and reported, also, results per category. Inconsistent information has been found on 16%-49.6% of websites, with this percentage rising to 54%-94% in the case of 'weight loss' information. Purely congruent with guidelines information was found on 18%-39.7% of websites. Commercial sites were inferior in terms of quality to the rest. The readability level was estimated as higher than the recommended in 9 out of 11 studies that assessed it.

Conclusions: Results of the present systematic review indicate that inaccurate and hard-to-read dietary advice is found on many websites, regardless of the dietary topic.

Keywords: diet; information; nutrition; quality; readability; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart.

References

    1. European Commission. 53% of EU citizens sought health information online. 2020 [cited 2023 February 26]. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20200327-1
    1. Maon SN, Hassan NM, Seman SAA. Online health information seeking behavior pattern. Adv Sci Lett. 2017;23(11):10582–10585.
    1. Obasola OI, Agunbiade OM. Online health information seeking pattern among undergraduates in a Nigerian University. SAGE Open. 2016;6:2158244016635255.
    1. Pollard CM, Pulker CE, Meng X, Kerr DA, Scott JA. Who uses the internet as a source of nutrition and dietary information? An Australian population perspective. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(8):e4548. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fassier P, Chhim AS, Andreeva VA, Hercberg S, Latino‐Martel P, Pouchieu C, et al. Seeking health‐ and nutrition‐related information on the Internet in a large population of French adults: results of the NutriNet‐Santé study. Br J Nutr. 2016;115(11):2039–2046. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources