Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 26:16:e20.
doi: 10.15420/usc.2021.23. eCollection 2022.

Intensive Care Management of the Cardiogenic Shock Patient

Affiliations
Review

Intensive Care Management of the Cardiogenic Shock Patient

Shahana Uddin et al. US Cardiol. .

Abstract

Optimal management of patients with cardiogenic shock requires a detailed and systematic assessment of all organ systems, balancing the risks and benefits of any investigation and intervention, while avoiding the complications of critical illness. Overall prognosis depends upon a number of factors, including that of the underlying cardiac disease and its potential reversibility, the severity of shock, the involvement of other organ systems, the age of the patient and comorbidities. As with all intensive care patients, the mainstay of management is supportive, up to and including implementation and management of a number of devices, including acute mechanical circulatory support. The assessment and management of these most critically ill patients therefore demands in-depth knowledge and skill relating to cardiac intensive care, extending well beyond standard intensive care or cardiology practice.

Keywords: Cardiogenic shock; echocardiography; extracorporeal support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. The Chain of Survival in Cardiogenic Shock
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Calculation of Total Isovolumic Time in a Critically Ill Cardiogenic Shock Patient
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. Emergency Loss of Cardiac Output on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Figure 4:
Figure 4:. Suggested Protocols for Apnea Testing and Withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatments on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

References

    1. Kanwar M, Thayer KL, Garan AR et al. Impact of age on outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:688098. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.688098. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baran DA, Grines CL, Bailey S et al. SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;94:29–37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28329. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3599–726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fordyce CB, Katz JN, Alviar CL et al. Prevention of complications in the cardiac intensive care unit: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142:e379–406. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000909. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Combes A, Price S, Slutsky AS, Brodie D. Temporary circulatory support for cardiogenic shock. Lancet. 2020;396:199–212. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31047-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources