Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 28:16:e05.
doi: 10.15420/usc.2021.12. eCollection 2022.

Hemodynamic-based Assessment and Management of Cardiogenic Shock

Affiliations
Review

Hemodynamic-based Assessment and Management of Cardiogenic Shock

Jaime Hernandez-Montfort et al. US Cardiol. .

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a deadly disease entity challenging patients, caregivers, and communities across the globe. CS can rapidly lead to the development of hypoperfusion and end-organ dysfunction, transforming a predictable hemodynamic event into a potential high-resource, intense, hemometabolic clinical catastrophe. Based on the scalable heterogeneity from a cellular level to healthcare systems in the hemodynamic-based management of patients experiencing CS, the authors present considerations towards systematic hemodynamic-based transitions in which distinct clinical entities share the common path of early identification and rapid transitions through an adaptive longitudinal situational awareness model of care that influences specific management considerations. Future studies are needed to best understand optimal management of drugs and devices along with engagement of health systems of care for patients with CS.

Keywords: Cardiogenic shock; acute decompensated heart failure; acute myocardial infarction; post-cardiotomy shock; pulmonary embolism; valvular heart disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: JHM has acted as a consultant for Abiomed. JE has acted as a consultant for Abbott and Getinge. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Clinical, Hemodynamic, and Imaging Longitudinal Profiling
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Hemodynamic, Device-related, and Imaging Hemodynamic Contextualization in the Weaning of Transvalvular Microaxial Flow Pumps
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. Adoption of Real-world Data and Contemporary Classification in the Management of Heart Failure-related Cardiogenic Shock

References

    1. van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136:e232–68. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alvarez PA, Hernandez-Montfort JA. Shock team approaches in managing cardiogenic shock – intersection between critical care and advanced heart failure and transplant cardiology. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2020;22:20. doi: 10.1007/s11936-020-00820-2. - DOI
    1. Henry TD, Tomey MI, Tamis-Holland JE et al. Invasive management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143:e815–29. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000959. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Thelemann N et al. Intraaortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: long-term 6-year outcome of the randomized IABP-SHOCK II trial. Circulation. 2019;139:395–403. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.118.038201. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basir MB, Kapur NK, Patel K et al. Improved outcomes associated with the use of shock protocols: updates from the national cardiogenic shock initiative. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93:1173–83. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28307. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources