Blood Eosinophil Count is the Dominant Clinical Marker for type 2 Inflammatory Severity in CRSwNP
- PMID: 39601113
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.31899
Blood Eosinophil Count is the Dominant Clinical Marker for type 2 Inflammatory Severity in CRSwNP
Abstract
Objective: Severe type 2 eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is challenging to treat and susceptible to recurrence post-surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between clinical markers and tissue type 2 inflammatory severity in patients with CRSwNP.
Methods: Adult patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery for bilateral CRSwNP were prospectively enrolled. Tissue eosinophil count (TEC) was evaluated. Expression levels of type 2 cytokines, including IL-5 and IL-13, in nasal polyps were determined using real-time PCR. Correlations between clinical markers and tissue type 2 inflammation were also assessed.
Results: In total, 150 participants were recruited. Ninety-five (63.3%) exhibited type 2 eosinophilic CRSwNP defined by TEC ≥10/high power field. Weak to moderate correlations were observed between clinical and tissue markers of type 2 inflammation. Among the clinical markers, blood eosinophil count (BEC) exhibited the highest correlation with tissue type 2 inflammatory severity, as determined by TEC, IL-5, and IL-13 expression levels in nasal polyps. Comorbid asthma, nonsmoking status, ethmoid/maxillary sinuses (E/M) ratio, and BEC were significant predictors of eosinophilic CRSwNP in the regression analysis.
Conclusions: BEC, a dominant clinical marker, exhibits the highest correlation with tissue type 2 inflammatory severity, as determined by TEC, IL-5, and IL-13 in nasal polyps. Comorbid asthma, nonsmoking status, E/M ratio, and BEC were significant predictors of eosinophilic CRSwNP. This could help clinicians better evaluate the severity of type 2 inflammation in patients with CRSwNP and provide optimal therapeutic strategies.
Level of evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 135:1326-1334, 2025.
Keywords: IL‐13; IL‐5; chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp; eosinophil; type 2 inflammation.
© 2024 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, et al. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020. Rhinology. 2020;58:1‐464.
-
- Cho SH, Hamilos DL, Han DH, Laidlaw TM. Phenotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8:1505‐1511.
-
- Kato A, Peters AT, Stevens WW, Schleimer RP, Tan BK, Kern RC. Endotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis: relationships to disease phenotypes, pathogenesis, clinical findings, and treatment approaches. Allergy. 2022;77:812‐826.
-
- Grayson JW, Hopkins C, Mori E, Senior B, Harvey RJ. Contemporary classification of chronic rhinosinusitis beyond polyps vs no polyps: a review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146:831‐838.
-
- Nakayama T, Haruna SI. A review of current biomarkers in chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2023;19:883‐892.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
