Predicting unicompartmental arthroplasty success: a three year Indian study
- PMID: 39601815
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06379-y
Predicting unicompartmental arthroplasty success: a three year Indian study
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the three year clinical outcomes and predictors of success for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in an Indian population.
Methods: Twenty patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (≥ Ahlbäck grade 2) underwent UKA. American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Visual Analogue Scale Score (VAS) were assessed at baseline, two weeks, six weeks, three months, and three years. Postoperative Hip Knee Ankle angle (HKA) and the Knee Joint Line Obliquity angle (KJO) were measured.
Results: At three years, UKA led to significant improvements in knee health, function, and pain. AKKS improved from 62.20 ± 5.27 to 90.60 ± 3.81, OKS from 37.00 ± 1.55 to 19.15 ± 1.93, and VAS from 8.45 ± 0.69 to 2.40 ± 0.59 (all P < 0.05). Preoperative VAS was significantly correlated with both preoperative and postoperative outcomes of knee health and function (preoperative and three year AKSS and OKS), and limb alignment (HKA and KJO). Preoperative AKSS correlated with postoperative knee health and functional outcomes (3-year AKSS and OKS), pain levels (3-year VAS), and limb alignment (KJO).
Conclusions: In this study of an Indian population, UKA demonstrated significant, sustained clinical improvements over three years, with no implant-related complications. In our cohort, preoperative pain and knee health significantly predicted outcomes. These findings suggest that preoperative assessment and optimization of both pain and knee health may potentially enhance the postoperative outcomes after UKA.
Keywords: Arthroplasty; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Unicompartmental.
© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Letter to the Editor regarding the article: "Predicting unicompartmental arthroplasty success: a three year Indian study".Int Orthop. 2025 May;49(5):1255-1256. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06475-7. Epub 2025 Mar 6. Int Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40047875 No abstract available.
References
-
- Wang S, Tian J, Lo GH (2021) Osteoarthritis, obesity and weight loss: a scoping review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22:689. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04556-9 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Goodell PB, Johansen PM, Bartels DW, Sherman SL, Amanatullah DF (2023) Comparing Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy for isolated medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. JBJS Rev 11(3). e22.00127
-
- Suarez JC, Saxena A, Arguelles W, Watson Perez JM, Ramamoorthy V, Hernandez Y, Osondu CU (2022) Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Risk-adjusted Comparison of 30-day Outcomes Using National Data From 2014 to 2018. Arthroplast Today 17:114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.06.017
-
- Mittal A, Meshram P, Kim WH, Kim TK (2020) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, an enigma, and the ten enigmas of medial UKA. J Orthop Traumatol 21(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-020-00551-x - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Weber P, Beck M, Klug M, Klug A, Klug A, Glowalla C, Gollwitzer H (2023) Survival of patient-specific unicondylar knee replacement. J Pers Med 13(4):665. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040665 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
