Cognitive reflection is a distinct and measurable trait
- PMID: 39602272
- PMCID: PMC11626181
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2409191121
Cognitive reflection is a distinct and measurable trait
Abstract
We report the findings of an adversarial collaboration examining whether the cognitive reflection test (CRT) measures anything beyond mathematical aptitude and, if so, whether its incremental predictive validity can be attributed to reflection, per se. We found that an 8-item CRT has greater predictive validity than an 8-item Mathematical Aptitude Test (MAT) consisting of comparably difficult items which lack dominant intuitive lures. Further, the incremental predictive validity stems from the CRT's measurement of reflection, which we show using both structural equation models and a dual-response paradigm that helps distinguish susceptibility to intuitions from inadequate mathematical aptitude.
Keywords: cognitive reflection; dual-system theory; individual differences.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests statement:The authors declare no competing interest.
Figures
References
-
- Frederick S., Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econ. Perspect. 19, 25–42 (2005).
-
- Kahneman D., Thinking, Fast and Slow (Macmillan, 2011).
-
- Kahneman D., Frederick S., Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Heuristics Biases 49, 49–81 (2002).
-
- Kahneman D., Frederick S., A model of heuristic judgment. Cambridge Handb. Thinking Reasoning 267, 267–293 (2005).
-
- Meyer A., Frederick S., The formation and revision of intuitions. Cognition 240, 105380 (2023). - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
