Assessing postoperative toric intraocular lens rotation: comparative analysis
- PMID: 39602338
- DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001585
Assessing postoperative toric intraocular lens rotation: comparative analysis
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of 3 distinct postoperative toric intraocular lens (TIOL) rotational stability measurement methods.
Setting: Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Design: Single-center, prospective, interventional clinical trial.
Methods: 128 eyes of 81 patients with age-related cataract received a hydrophobic acrylic TIOL Clareon CNW0T3-9. To evaluate rotational stability, 3 distinct assessment methods were used: (Rotix) comparing the TIOL axis at the end of surgery (EoS) with 1 week and 6 months postoperatively using reference vessels at the sclera, (Slitlamp) comparing the intended axis (IA) with the axis at 1 week and 6 months using slitlamp photography using the horizontal axis as a reference, and (Casia) comparing the IA with the axis at 1 week and 6 months using the axis determination tool of a swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomographer (Casia 2).
Results: Mean absolute rotation from EoS/IA to 6 months differed significantly among Rotix (1.33 ± 1.99 degrees [0.01; 19.80]), Casia (2.88 ± 2.64 degrees [0.00; 19.00]), and Slit-lamp (4.38 ± 3.38 degrees [0.02; 19.38]), as indicated by the Friedman test (χ 2 = 71.852, P < .001). Bland-Altman coefficients of repeatability (CoRs) indicated the closest agreement of results between Casia and Rotix, with a CoR of ±3.95 degrees, followed by Slit-lamp and Casia (±6.82 degrees), and finally, between Slit-lamp and Rotix (±7.19 degrees).
Conclusions: When assessing true TIOL rotational stability, it is imperative to use fixed anatomical landmarks as a reference and establish a baseline at the EoS. When assessing TIOL rotation along the horizontal axis, considering cyclorotation of the eye is crucial and must not be underestimated.
Copyright © 2024 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.
References
-
- Kaur M, Shaikh F, Falera R, Titiyal J. Optimizing outcomes with toric intraocular lenses. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65(12):1301–1313. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_810_17 - DOI
-
- Tognetto D, Perrotta AA, Bauci F, Rinaldi S, Antonuccio M, Pellegrino FA, Fenu G, Stamatelatos G, Alpins N. Quality of images with toric intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(3):376–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.10.053 - DOI
-
- Chang DF. Early rotational stability of the longer Staar toric intraocular lens: fifty consecutive cases. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(5):935–940. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01843-6 - DOI
-
- Lee BS, Chang DF. Comparison of the rotational stability of two toric intraocular lenses in 1273 consecutive eyes. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(9):1325–1331. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.02.012 - DOI
-
- Singh A, Kapoor G, Baranwal VK, Kalra N. Rotational stability of Toric intraocular lenses. Med J Armed Forces India. 2022;78(1):68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.03.014 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources