Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):1481.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11984-z.

Understanding the effectiveness and quality of virtual cancer multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs): a systematic scoping review

Anjola Onifade  1 , Samantha L Quaife  2 , David Holden  3   4 , Donna Chung  5 , Martin Birchall  3 , Michael D Peake  3   6   7 , Muntzer Mughal  3 , Daisy McInnerney  2
Affiliations

Understanding the effectiveness and quality of virtual cancer multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs): a systematic scoping review

Anjola Onifade et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer multi-disciplinary team meetings (MDTM) assemble clinical experts to make diagnostic and treatment recommendations. MDTMs can take place in person, virtually, or in a hybrid format. Virtual and hybrid MDTMs have been in use for over two decades. This systematic scoping review aims to map the evidence on virtual and hybrid MDTM formats over time, providing insights into their quality, and the facilitators and barriers to their effective delivery.

Methods: The PRISMA scoping review checklist has been followed. A systematic search of PubMed, PsychINFO, and Embase between 1990-2023 identified 9399 records. These were independently screened by two researchers to identify primary research of any design that assessed quality or effectiveness of cancer VMDTMs. Results were narratively synthesised.

Results: Eight quantitative, two qualitative and three mixed-methods studies were included. All were observational and most were retrospective (n = 8). Varied outcome measures were used to evaluate meeting quality, including treatment recommendations, survival, time from diagnosis, and overall attendance. VMDTMs were superior (N = 6) or sometimes equivalent (N = 4) to face-to-face meetings. Studies identified implementation factors critical to their effective delivery, including internet-stability and chairing.

Conclusion: The heterogeneous literature suggests VMDTMs offer some benefits over face-to-face meetings. Training and infrastructure are key to prevent risks to patient safety. A definitive comparative evaluation is needed to inform best practice.

Keywords: Cancer; Effectiveness; Health service; Hybrid; Multidisciplinary team meetings; Quality; Virtual.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable as research did not involve human or animal experimentation. Consent for publication: No individual person’s data is included so consent for publication is not indicated. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Multidisciplinary Team Meeting. Available from: https://www.datadictionary.nhs.uk/nhs_business_definitions/multidiscipli.... Cited 2022 May 2
    1. Ke KM, Blazeby JM, Strong S, Carroll FE, Ness AR, Hollingworth W. Are multidisciplinary teams in secondary care cost-effective? A systematic review of the literature. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2013;11(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23557141/. Cited 2022 May 3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R, Griffith C, Trevatt P, Richards M, et al. Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? BMJ. 2010;340(7749):743–5. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c951. Cited 2022 May 3. - PubMed
    1. Department of Health. The NHS Cancer Plan: A Plan for Investment, A Plan for Reform. Department of Health; 2000. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-nhs-cancer-plan-a-plan-fo.... Cited 2022 May 3.
    1. Friedland PL, Bozic B, Dewar J, Kuan R, Meyer C, Phillips M. Impact of multidisciplinary team management in head and neck cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(8):1246–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21448166/. Cited 2022 May 3. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources