Towards a Unified Set of Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis
- PMID: 39605172
- PMCID: PMC11831880
- DOI: 10.1002/ana.27145
Towards a Unified Set of Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis
Abstract
Objective: The 2017 McDonald criteria continued the separation of diagnostic criteria for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS) for historical, rather than biological, reasons. We aimed to explore the feasibility of a single, unified set of diagnostic criteria when applied to patients with suspected PPMS.
Methods: We retrospectively identified patients evaluated for suspected PPMS at 5 European centers. The 2017 McDonald PPMS criteria was the gold standard against which the 2017 McDonald RRMS dissemination in space (DIS) and dissemination in time criteria were evaluated. We also investigated modified RRMS DIS criteria, including: (i) optic nerve lesions; (ii) ≥2 spinal cord lesions; and (iii) higher fulfilment of DIS criteria alone (lesions in ≥3 regions) without dissemination in time/positive cerebrospinal fluid, for a diagnosis of PPMS.
Results: A total of 282 patients were diagnosed with PPMS using the 2017 McDonald criteria, and 40 with alternate disorders. The 2017 McDonald RRMS DIS criteria and the modified DIS criteria including the optic nerve or ≥2 spinal cord lesions performed well in PPMS diagnosis when combined with dissemination in time/positive cerebrospinal fluid (sensitivity 92.9-95.4%, specificity 95%, accuracy 93.2-95.3%). A diagnosis of PPMS based on high fulfillment of modified RRMS DIS criteria had high specificity, but low sensitivity. A diagnostic algorithm applicable to patients evaluated for suspected MS is proposed.
Interpretation: The 2017 McDonald RRMS criteria and modifications to DIS criteria, currently under consideration, performed well in PPMS diagnosis. Forthcoming revisions to the McDonald criteria should consider a single, unified set of diagnostic criteria for MS. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:571-582.
© 2024 The Author(s). Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.
Conflict of interest statement
J.K., F.B., A.R., J.S.G., M.T., M.A.R., M.F., BS, XM, AJT, and OC participated in the 2023 McDonald Diagnostic Criteria Review Meeting in November/December 2023, where data presented in this manuscript were presented and discussed. The conception, design, and analysis of this study, and the preparation of this manuscript are independent of the 2023 McDonald Diagnostic Criteria Review Meeting. The authors have nothing to report.
Figures
References
-
- Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, et al. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2018;391:1622–1636. - PubMed
-
- Thompson AJ, Montalban X, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnostic criteria for primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a position paper. Ann Neurol 2000;47:831–835. - PubMed
-
- McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50:121–127. - PubMed
-
- Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 2005;58:840–846. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
