Minimally Invasive Versus Invasive Proteomics: Urine and Blood Biomarkers in Coronary Artery Disease
- PMID: 39605279
- DOI: 10.1002/prca.202400062
Minimally Invasive Versus Invasive Proteomics: Urine and Blood Biomarkers in Coronary Artery Disease
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. This underlines the urgent need for effective biomarkers for early diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic counseling. Proteomic signatures from plasma and urine have emerged as promising tools for these efforts, each offering unique advantages and challenges. This review provides a detailed comparison of urine and blood proteomic analyzes in the context of CAD and explores their respective advantages and limitations. Urine proteomics offers a minimally invasive, easily repeatable, and temporally stable sampling method, but faces challenges such as lower protein concentrations and potential contamination. Despite its invasive nature, blood proteomics captures high protein concentration and directly reflects systemic physiological changes, making it valuable for acute assessments. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly improved the analysis and interpretation of proteomic data, enabling greater accuracy in diagnosis and predictive modeling. AI algorithms, particularly in pattern recognition and data integration, are helping to uncover subtle relationships between biomarkers and disease progression and supporting the discovery of plasma- and urine-based CAD biomarkers. This review demonstrates the potential of combining urine and blood proteomic data using AI to advance personalized approaches in CAD diagnosis and treatment. Future research should focus on standardization of collection protocols, validation of biomarkers in different populations, and the complexity of integrating data from different sources to maximize the potential of proteomics in the treatment of CAD.
Keywords: artificial intelligence (AI); coronary artery disease (CAD); personalized medicine; proteomics; urine and blood biomarkers.
© 2024 Wiley‐VCH GmbH.
References
-
- S. Kaur, D. Devendra, and S. Rai, “Coronary Artery Disease: An Overview,” A and V Pub Journal of Nursing and Medical Research 2, no. 1 (2023): 22–24.
-
- A. K. Malakar, D. Choudhury, B. Halder, P. Paul, A. Uddin, and S. Chakraborty, “A Review on Coronary Artery Disease, Its Risk Factors, and Therapeutics,” Journal of Cellular Physiology 234 (2019): 16812–16823.
-
- R. McPherson and A. Tybjaerg‐Hansen, “Genetics of Coronary Artery Disease,” Circulation Research 118 (2016): 564–578.
-
- H. Kumakura, K. Fujita, H. Kanai, et al., “High‐Sensitivity C‐Reactive Protein, Lipoprotein(a) and Homocysteine Are Risk Factors for Coronary Artery Disease in Japanese Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease,” Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis 22 (2015): 344–354.
-
- L. Goudhaman, A. Raja Jagadeesan, S. Sundaramoorthi, S. Thotla, and S. Krishna Mohan, “Association of Serum Asymmetric Dimethylarginine With the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease: A Pilot Study,” Reports of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 10 (2021): 302–306.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous