Utility of PSA free-to-total ratio for clinically significant prostate cancer in men with a PSA level of <4 ng/mL
- PMID: 39607059
- DOI: 10.1111/bju.16597
Utility of PSA free-to-total ratio for clinically significant prostate cancer in men with a PSA level of <4 ng/mL
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the relationship between the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) free-to-total ratio (FTR) and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group ≥2, clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men with a low PSA level (≤4 ng/mL). Patients and Methods Data were obtained from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. Patients with a PSA level of ≤4 ng/mL and who received a biopsy within a year of this PSA measurement were included. Associations between FTR and csPCa were investigated with logistic regression, adjusting for age and PSA, a re-scaled Brier score (index of predictive accuracy), and decision curve analysis.
Results: A total of 406 patients were analysed with 139 (34%) having csPCa and 204 (50%) having any grade PCa. For those with an FTR ≤0.15, 46% had csPCa, vs 22% for those with a ratio ≥0.20. In a regression model, the predicted probability of csPCa for a 60-year-old with a PSA of 3 ng/mL was 61% if the FTR was 0.05, falling to 18% if the FTR was 0.30. A clear negative relationship between increasing FTR and probability of csPCa was observed. A model containing FTR additional to PSA and age provides greater net benefit as per decision curve analysis and likely superior discrimination and calibration measured by a higher index of predictive accuracy.
Conclusions: In middle-aged men with a PSA level between 1.5 and 4 ng/mL but otherwise indicated for biopsy, a low FTR is associated with higher rates of csPCa. It should be utilised as an additional, readily available and inexpensive test to improve prediction of csPCa and aid in patient counselling.
Keywords: Prostate‐specific antigen; clinically significant prostate cancer; free‐to‐total PSA ratio; prostate cancer; prostate cancer screening.
© 2024 BJU International.
Similar articles
-
[Analysis of the relationship between PI-RADS scores and the pathological results of targeted biopsy based on MRI].Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 23;45(11):942-947. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220805-00538. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023. PMID: 37968079 Chinese.
-
Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?Eur Urol. 2018 Jul;74(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 19. Eur Urol. 2018. PMID: 29566957
-
Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.Prostate. 2022 Feb;82(3):388-396. doi: 10.1002/pros.24286. Epub 2021 Dec 16. Prostate. 2022. PMID: 34914121 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Properties of Total and Free Prostate-Specific Antigen to Predict Overall and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Among Men With Low Testosterone and Prior Negative Biopsy.Urology. 2020 Mar;137:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 14. Urology. 2020. PMID: 31733275 Clinical Trial.
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA Oncol. 2024 Jun 1;10(6):745-754. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0734. JAMA Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38576242 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Immunol. 2025 Feb 4;16:1465971. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1465971. eCollection 2025. Front Immunol. 2025. PMID: 39967666 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hudson MA, Bahnson RR, Catalona WJ. Clinical use of prostate‐specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 1989; 142: 1011–1017
-
- Catalona WJ, Richie JP, deKernion JB et al. Comparison of prostate specific antigen concentration versus prostate specific antigen density in the early detection of prostate cancer: receiver operating characteristic curves. J Urol 1994; 152: 2031–2036
-
- Wolf AM, Wender RC, Etzioni RB et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60: 70–98
-
- Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate‐specific antigen level ≤ 4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2239–2246
-
- Christensson A, Bjork T, Nilsson O et al. Serum prostate specific antigen complexed to α1‐antichymotrypsin as an indicator of prostate cancer. J Urol 1993; 150: 100–105
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous