Evaluating the 7-day barrier: early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis with prolonged symptom duration; a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 39607476
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03555-x
Evaluating the 7-day barrier: early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis with prolonged symptom duration; a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: The gold standard for treating acute cholecystitis is an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, whether this still applies for a > 7-day existing cholecystitis remains heavily debated. Therefore, this systematic review investigates the safety of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for a > 7-day existing cholecystitis.
Methods: PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for all studies comparing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with 0-7 versus > 7-day existing cholecystitis at time of surgery. Meta-analyses were performed on dichotomous and continuous outcomes with risk difference (RD) and mean difference (MD) as measures of effect.
Results: A total of 3007 studies were screened, resulting in the inclusion of 13 non-randomised studies comprising 5481 patients. Of these, 4690 received cholecystectomy within 7 days, and 791 after 7 days. Operating times (MD -11.8 min; 95% CI [-18.4; -5.2]) and total hospital stay (MD -2.7 days; 95% CI [-4.0; -1.4]) were longer in the > 7-day group. However, no significant risk difference was found for combined major complications: bile duct injury/leakage and bowel injury (RD -1.0%; 95% CI [-2.3; 0.3]), for complications graded Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 (RD -0.3%; 95% CI [-2.5; 1.9]), or for conversions (RD -1.5%; 95% CI [-3.9; 0.9]).
Conclusion: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis after the 7-day barrier might be harder, as reflected by longer operating times. However, a significant increase in complications or conversions was not found. Due to the risk of bias and lack of well-powered studies directly comparing early cholecystectomy after 7 days with alternative strategies, strong recommendations cannot be made. Meanwhile, it is advised to carefully weigh the treatment options in case of a > 7-day existing cholecystitis, based on patient's characteristics and surgeon's experience.
Keywords: Cholecystitis; Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Timing.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. The manuscript is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Disclosures: M.H.G. van Maasakkers, T.J. Weijs, O.P. Cnossen, W.G. van Braak, J.C. Kelder, D Roulin, and D. Boerma have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4728-4741. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6400-0. Epub 2018 Aug 23. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 30167953
-
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for lithiasic acute cholecystitis during emergency admissions. Results of a monocentric experience and review of the literature.Tunis Med. 2016 Aug-Sep;94(8-9):519-524. Tunis Med. 2016. PMID: 28603823 Review.
-
Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in aged acute calculous cholecystitis: a cohort study.Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2994-3001. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07091-4. Epub 2019 Aug 28. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31463722
-
Comparative operative outcomes of early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a population-based propensity score analysis.Ann Surg. 2014 Jan;259(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5cf36. Ann Surg. 2014. PMID: 23979286
-
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1172-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4325-4. Epub 2015 Jul 3. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26139487 Review.
References
-
- Kimura Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y et al (2007) Definitions, pathophysiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-006-1152-y - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Pisano M, Allievi N, Gurusamy K et al (2020) 2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00336-x
-
- Gurusamy KS, Davidson C, Gluud C, Davidson BR (2013) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub3 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T et al (2018) Tokyo guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25:55–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.516 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cao AM, Eslick GD, Cox MR (2015) Early Cholecystectomy is Superior to delayed cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: a Meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 19:848–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2747-x - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous