Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr;43(4):656-665.
doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01711-3. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

Influence of visceral adipose tissue on the accuracy of tumor T-staging of gastric cancer in preoperative CT

Affiliations

Influence of visceral adipose tissue on the accuracy of tumor T-staging of gastric cancer in preoperative CT

Danping Wu et al. Jpn J Radiol. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of the visceral adipose tissue (VAT) area and density on the accuracy of tumor T-staging of gastric cancer in preoperative computed tomography (CT).

Methods: This study included 136 patients with gastric cancer in our research center from January 2021 to June 2022. The patients were divided into two groups based on their postoperative pathological results: accurate-staging (matched T-staging evaluated by preoperative CT and postoperative pathology) and inaccurate-staging (unmatched T-staging evaluated by preoperative CT and postoperative pathology) groups. Preoperative CT was performed to assess the VAT area and density, and logistic regression was employed to evaluate the effect of VAT on the accuracy of preoperative-CT-evaluated T-staging of patients with gastric cancer.

Results: The accurate-staging group had a significantly higher VAT area (134.64 ± 70.55 cm2 vs 95.44 ± 66.18 cm2, P = 0.003) and significantly lower VAT density (-95.05 ± 12.28 Hounsfield Units [HU] vs - 89.68 ± 13.26 HU, P = 0.027) than the inaccurate-staging group. A low VAT area (P = 0.002) and tumor located in the upper stomach (P = 0.019) were significantly associated with and were independent risk factors for the error of CT-evaluated T-staging. Compared to a VAT area ≥ 81.04 cm2, which was used as a reference, the odds ratio (OR) of a VAT area < 81.04 cm2 for the probability of T-staging mis-assessment was 4.455 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.728-11.485).

Conclusions: A low VAT area in patients with gastric cancer had adverse effects on preoperative CT-evaluated T-staging.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; Postoperative complications; Visceral fat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
    1. Lin J-X, Tang Y-H, Lin G-J, et al. Association of adjuvant chemotherapy with overall survival among patients with locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5: e225557. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Tang Z, Wang Y, Yu Y, et al. Neoadjuvant apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial. BMC Med. 2022;20:107. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Kang W-Z, Wang B-Z, Li D-F, et al. Can gastric cancer patients with high mandard score benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;2022:8178184. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Fairweather M, Jajoo K, Sainani N, et al. Accuracy of EUS and CT imaging in preoperative gastric cancer staging. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111:1016–20. - PubMed