Prophylactic surgical drain placement with irrigation reduces abscess formation in patients with severe, uncontained, perforated appendicitis
- PMID: 39607567
- PMCID: PMC11980992
- DOI: 10.1007/s00383-024-05892-w
Prophylactic surgical drain placement with irrigation reduces abscess formation in patients with severe, uncontained, perforated appendicitis
Abstract
Background: 20-25% of perforated appendicitis cases are complicated by abscess formation. This study assesses whether prophylactic closed-suction surgical drain (SD) placement after irrigation can decrease postoperative abscess formation in patients with extensively contaminated, perforated appendicitis.Affiliations: Journal instruction requires country for affiliations; however, these are missing in all affiliations. Please verify if the provided country names are correct and amend if necessary.They're correct METHODS: A multicenter retrospective review was performed on pediatric patients with uncontained perforated appendicitis from January 1, 2020 to August 1, 2023. Limited irrigation was performed. All SDs were oriented towards the pelvis. Data were analyzed in four groups: (G1) SD and irrigation, (G2) only SD, (G3) only irrigation, (G4) neither SD nor irrigation.
Results: One hundred and fifteen patients (44 in G1, 3 in G2, 21 in G3, 47 in G4) were included. The abscess rate was 5.1% (G1), 33.3% (G2), 33.3% (G3), and 37.0% (G4) (p = 0.001). No interventional radiology (IR) drains were placed in G1 and G2. SD duration was 4.1 ± 2.1 days in G1 and 2.7 ± 0.6 days in G2. IR drain duration was 14 ± 10.7 days in G3 and 8.3 ± 3.9 days in G4 (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in total length of stay and antibiotic duration.
Conclusions: Irrigation with prophylactic SD placement may prevent postoperative abscesses in patients with severe, uncontained, perforated appendicitis, but prospective data are needed.
Keywords: Abscess; Interventional radiology; Perforated appendicitis; Prophylactic drain placement.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Could an abdominal drainage be avoided in complicated acute appendicitis? Lessons learned after 1300 laparoscopic appendectomies.Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):40-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Oct 12. Int J Surg. 2016. PMID: 27743898
-
The utility of intraperitoneal drain placement after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in postoperative intraperitoneal abscess prevention.Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3571-3577. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10869-w. Epub 2024 May 15. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38750172
-
Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized trial.Ann Surg. 2012 Oct;256(4):581-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826a91e5. Ann Surg. 2012. PMID: 22964730 Clinical Trial.
-
Peritoneal irrigation vs suction alone during pediatric appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(50):e18047. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018047. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31852066 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advantages comparison of peritoneal drainage versus no drainage after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a meta-analysis.BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 16;24(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03500-8. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 39550531 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical