Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 28;27(1):e243.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980024001356.

Strengthening the governance of food systems for nutrition in Africa: a political economy analysis of food policy in South Africa and Ghana

Affiliations

Strengthening the governance of food systems for nutrition in Africa: a political economy analysis of food policy in South Africa and Ghana

Anne Marie Thow et al. Public Health Nutr. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine underlying political economy factors that enable or impede the integration of nutrition considerations into food system governance.

Design: Comparative political economy analysis of data collected through (1) value chain analyses of selected healthy and unhealthy commodities and (2) food system policy analyses, using a theoretical framework focused on power, politics, interests and ideas.

Setting: Ghana and South Africa.

Participants: Value chain actors relevant to healthy and unhealthy foods (Ghana n 121; South Africa n 72) and policy stakeholders from government (Health, Agriculture, Trade and Industry, Finance), academia, civil society, development partners, Civil Society Organization (CSO) and private sector (Ghana n 28; South Africa n 48).

Results: Nutrition was a stated policy priority in both countries; however, policy responsibility was located within the health sector, with limited integration of nutrition into food system sectors (including Agriculture, Trade and Industry). Contributing factors included a conceptions of policy responsibilities for nutrition and food systems, dominant ideas and narratives regarding the economic role of the food industry and the purpose of food system policy, the influence of large food industry actors, and limited institutional structures for cross-sectoral engagement and coordination.

Conclusions: Integrating nutrition into multi-sectoral food policy to achieve multiple food system policy goals will require strategic action across jurisdictions and regional levels. Opportunities included increasing investment in healthy traditional foods, strengthening urban/rural linkages and informal food systems, and strengthening institutional structures for policy coherence and coordination related to nutrition.

Keywords: Agriculture; Double-burden; Food system; Ghana; Nutrition; Policy; South Africa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Popkin BM, Corvalan C & Grummer-Strawn LM (2020) Dynamics of the double burden of malnutrition and the changing nutrition reality. Lancet 395, 65–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The World Bank (2016) Cause of Death, by Non-Communicable Diseases (% of total) – Sub-Saharan Africa. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.DTH.NCOM.ZS?locations=ZG&view=chart (accessed 18 October 2019).
    1. Steyn NP & Mchiza ZJ (2014) Obesity and the nutrition transition in Sub-Saharan Africa. Ann NY Acad Sci 1311, 88–101. - PubMed
    1. Haggblade S, Duodu KG, Kabasa JD et al. (2016) Emerging early actions to bend the curve in sub-Saharan Africa’s nutrition transition. Food Nutr Bull 37, 219–241. - PubMed
    1. Hawkes C, Smith TG, Jewell J et al. (2015) Smart food policies for obesity prevention. Lancet 385, 2410–2421. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources