Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Jul 14;32(9):724-732.
doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae382.

Traditional risk factors, optimal cardiovascular health, and elevated lipoprotein(a)

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Traditional risk factors, optimal cardiovascular health, and elevated lipoprotein(a)

Alexander C Razavi et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. .

Abstract

Aims: To assess the association of traditional risk factor burden and Life's Simple 7 (LS7) score with incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) across lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels.

Methods and results: There were 6676 participants without clinical ASCVD from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis who underwent Lp(a) testing and were followed for incident ASCVD events (coronary heart disease and stroke). Low, intermediate, and elevated Lp(a) were defined as <30, 30-49, and ≥50 mg/dL, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression assessed the association of traditional risk factors and LS7 score (poor: 0-8, average: 9-10, and optimal: 11-14) with incident ASCVD across Lp(a) groups during a median follow-up of 17.7 years, adjusting for demographics and time-varying statin and aspirin therapy. The mean age was 62.1 years, 53% were women, and 61% were non-white. The median Lp(a) was 17 (interquartile range 8-41) mg/dL, 13% had Lp(a) 30-49 mg/dL, and 20% had Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL. Individuals with Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL had higher absolute event rates across all LS7 categories. There was no significant interaction between Lp(a) and LS7 score on incident ASCVD (P-interaction = 0.60). Compared to a poor LS7 score, optimal LS7 conferred a lower risk for incident ASCVD among individuals with Lp(a) < 30 [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-0.71], Lp(a) 30-49 (HR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02-0.89), and Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL (HR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.13-0.99).

Conclusion: Participants without clinical ASCVD who achieved an optimal LS7 score had ASCVD risk reduction regardless of Lp(a) level. These results emphasize the importance of a healthy lifestyle and ASCVD risk factor control among individuals with elevated Lp(a).

Keywords: American Heart Association; Cardiovascular disease; Cholesterol; Lifestyle; Lipoprotein(a); Prevention.

Plain language summary

Participants without clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) who achieved an optimal Life’s Simple 7 (LS7) score had ASCVD risk reduction regardless of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level.Compared to a poor LS7 score, an optimal LS7 score conferred a 55–88% lower ASCVD risk regardless of Lp(a) level.These results emphasize the importance of a healthy lifestyle and optimal ASCVD risk factor control among patients with elevated Lp(a).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: H.S.B. is a consultant/advisor for Kaneka, Novartis, Arrowhead, and Abbott. S.T. is a co-inventor and receives royalties from patents owned by UCSD, is a co-founder and has an equity interest in Oxitope and Kleanthi Diagnostics, and is a consult to Novartis and has a dual appointment at UCSD and Ionis Pharmaceuticals. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of California, San Diego in accordance with its conflict-of-interest policies. The other co-authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
(AC) Association between traditional risk factors and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events, per standard deviation change and stratified by (A) Lp(a) <30 mg/dL, (B) Lp(a) 30–49 mg/dL, (C) Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A-C) Cumulative incidence of ASCVD according to Life's Simple 7, stratified by, A) Lp(a) <30 mg/dL, B) Lp(a) 30-49 mg/dL, and C) Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL.

References

    1. Reyes-Soffer G, Ginsberg HN, Berglund L, Duell PB, Heffron SP, Kamstrup PR, et al. Lipoprotein(a): a genetically determined, causal, and prevalent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2022;42:e48–e60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsimikas S, Fazio S, Ferdinand KC, Ginsberg HN, Koschinsky ML, Marcovina SM, et al. Unmet needs in understanding lipoprotein(a) pathophysiology: NHLBI working group recommendations to reduce risk of cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:177–192. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malick WA, Goonewardena SN, Koenig W, Rosenson RS. Clinical trial design for lipoprotein(a)-lowering therapies: JACC Focus Seminar 2/3. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;81:1633–1645. - PubMed
    1. Sc S, Sperling L, Virani SS, Yeboah J. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:e285–e350. - PubMed
    1. Lloyd-Jones DM, Morris PB, Ballantyne CM, Birtcher KK, Covington AM, DePalma SM, et al. 2022 ACC expert consensus decision pathway on the role of nonstatin therapies for LDL-cholesterol lowering in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;80:1366–1418. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding