Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Dec;9(12):103986.
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103986. Epub 2024 Nov 27.

Maintenance with 5-FU/LV-aflibercept after induction with FOLFIRI-aflibercept versus FOLFIRI-aflibercept until progression as second-line treatment in older adults with metastatic colorectal cancer: the AFEMA phase II randomized trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Maintenance with 5-FU/LV-aflibercept after induction with FOLFIRI-aflibercept versus FOLFIRI-aflibercept until progression as second-line treatment in older adults with metastatic colorectal cancer: the AFEMA phase II randomized trial

P García-Alfonso et al. ESMO Open. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The combination chemotherapy i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan, and aflibercept (FOLFIRI-A) is a standard second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The aim was to assess maintenance treatment in second-line setting in older patients (aged ≥70 years) with mCRC.

Patients and methods: We evaluated FOLFIRI-A given for six cycles followed by maintenance with 5-FU/leucovorin (LV)-A (arm A) or FOLFIRI-A (arm B) until progression in older adults with mCRC in the AFEMA randomized, open-label, non-inferiority phase II trial (EudraCT2016-004076-21/NCT03279289). Patients aged ≥70 years who previously failed oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine were randomly allocated (1 : 1) to either arm A (experimental) or arm B (control). After enrolling 35 patients, the FOLFIRI dose was reduced to level 1 in both arms due to toxicity. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (PFS); and secondary endpoints were median overall survival, objective response rate, and safety. Non-inferiority required the upper confidence interval (CI) limit to not exceed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.5 (one-sided α = 0.075, 80% power).

Results: A total of 170 patients were randomly allocated to arm A or arm B (n = 85 each). The median follow-up was 12.2 versus 10.9 months in arm A versus arm B. Most patients died (83.5% versus 88.2% in arm A versus arm B), mainly from disease progression. PFS non-inferiority was met (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.566-1.076, P = 0.131) with a median PFS of 6.1 versus 5.5 months in arm A versus arm B. Median overall survival was similar in arms A and B (12.2 and 11.5 months, respectively) (HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.640-1.227, P = 0.467). During the maintenance phase, severe asthenia (4.5% versus 21.6%, P = 0.038), serious adverse events (SAEs) (17.8% versus 37.8%, P = 0.049), and treatment-related SAEs (6.7% versus 10.8%, P = 0.695) were reduced in arm A versus arm B.

Conclusion: In older adults, induction with six cycles of FOLFIRI-A plus maintenance with 5-FU/LV-A was non-inferior to FOLFIRI-A until progression. Severe asthenia, SAEs, and treatment-related SAEs were reduced with 5-FU/LV-A maintenance.

Keywords: 5-FU; FOLFIRI; aflibercept; maintenance treatment; metastatic colorectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. A total of 45 patients in arm A and 37 patients in arm B initiated the maintenance phase. 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; LV, leucovorin; mCRC, metastatic colorectal cancer; Q2W, once every 2 weeks.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient flow chart. 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; AE, adverse event; LV, leucovorin; PFS, progression-free survival; PP per protocol. aComputerized tomography scan >35 days. bSeven patients were excluded from the PP [in all of them the reason was that they did not have response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1 assessment done before end of treatment]. cA total of 13 patients were excluded from the PP (12 patients did not have RECIST v1.1 assessment done before end of treatment and 1 patient had a protocol deviation ‘previous tumor diagnosed <5 years ago’).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Progression-free survival and overall survival during the treatment with by arm A or arm B (ITT population). Arm A, FOLFIRI-aflibercept (six cycles) followed by maintenance treatment with 5-FU/LV-aflibercept; arm B, FOLFIRI-aflibercept. 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; CI, confidence interval; Cumulative survival, Kaplan–Meier cumulative survival curve; HR, hazard ratio; LV, leucovorin; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Goding Sauer A., et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(3):145–164. - PubMed
    1. Biller L.H., Schrag D. Diagnosis and treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review. JAMA. 2021;325(7):669–685. - PubMed
    1. European Cancer Information System. https://ecis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/factsheets.php Available at.
    1. Dekker E., Tanis P.J., Vleugels J.L.A., Kasi P.M., Wallace M.B. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2019;394(10207):1467–1480. - PubMed
    1. Van Cutsem E., Cervantes A., Adam R., et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(8):1386–1422. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts