Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 27;14(11):e089725.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089725.

Impact of gastrointestinal symptoms and psychological distress on quality of life in systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Impact of gastrointestinal symptoms and psychological distress on quality of life in systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional study

Luis Gerardo Alcala-Gonzalez et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterised by microvascular damage and fibrosis. Mortality in patients with SSc has significantly decreased. Consequently, patients with SSc have longer life expectancy, and health-related quality of life (HrQoL) has become more relevant in the comprehensive management of the disease.

Objective: To evaluate the impact between gastrointestinal (GI) symptom burden and psychological well-being on HrQoL in patients with SSc.

Design: Nested cross-sectional study conducted between January and July 2022.

Participants: A single-centre cohort of 166 patients with SSc, including 103 (55%) with limited cutaneous SSc, 43 (24%) with diffuse SSc and 37 (21%) with sine-sclerosis SSc.

Main measures: GI symptom burden was assessed using the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium gastrointestinal tract 2.0 (UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0) questionnaire, psychological well-being was measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and HrQoL was evaluated using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Demographic, clinical and immunological data were collected from a prospectively maintained database.

Key results: Patients with moderate to severe GI symptoms (UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0 score >0.5, n=95, 57%) reported decreased HrQoL in all subdomains except vitality by SF-36, and higher anxiety and depression scores by HADS (all p<0.05). The severity of GI symptom burden and depression were independently associated with a decline in the physical component of QoL (β=-0.273 and β=-0.411, respectively, p<0.01 for both). Only the severity of depression and anxiety (β=-0.482 and β=-0.213, respectively, p<0.05), but not GI symptom burden, were independently associated with a decline in the mental component of QoL.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that in patients with SSc, GI and psychological burden negatively influence quality of life independently, highlighting the need for a holistic approach to patient's care.

Keywords: Motility disorders; Psychological Stress; Quality of Life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of QoL by SF-36 between patients without significant gastrointestinal (GI) symptom burden (UCLA GIT 2.0<0.5, n=71) and patients with moderate GI symptoms or more (UCLA GIT>0.5, n=95). Mean+SD SF-36 Scores for the eight domains and for the physical and mental component summaries are standardised. A score below 50 reflects worse HrQoL compared with the average of the general Spanish population *p<0.05: Significant differences by Mann Whitney U test. HrQoL, health-related quality of life; SF-36, Short Form 36; UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0, University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium gastrointestinal tract 2.0.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Correlation matrix between the results of the SF-36 physical and mental component summaries scores, the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0 subscales and total scores, and HADS depression and anxiety scores. Correlation was evaluated using Pearson’s R. HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; SF-36, Short Form 36; UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0, University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium gastrointestinal tract 2.0.

References

    1. Volkmann ER, Andréasson K, Smith V. Systemic sclerosis. Lancet. 2023;401:304–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01692-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McMahan ZH, Kulkarni S, Chen J, et al. Systemic sclerosis gastrointestinal dysmotility: risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2023;19:166–81. doi: 10.1038/s41584-022-00900-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quinlivan A, McMahan ZH, Lee EB, et al. Gastrointestinal Tract Considerations Part I: How Should a Rheumatologist Best Manage Common Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Complaints in Systemic Sclerosis? Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2023;49:295–318. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2023.01.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quinlivan A, McMahan ZH, Lee EB, et al. Gastrointestinal Tract Considerations: Part II: How Should a Rheumatologist Best Manage Common Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Complaints in Systemic Sclerosis? Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2023;49:319–36. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2023.01.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheah JX, Khanna D, McMahan ZH. Management of scleroderma gastrointestinal disease: Lights and shadows. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2022;7:85–97. doi: 10.1177/23971983221086343. - DOI - PMC - PubMed