Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 26;15(2):221-230.
doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004673.

End of life care in paediatric settings: UK national survey

Affiliations

End of life care in paediatric settings: UK national survey

Andre Bedendo et al. BMJ Support Palliat Care. .

Abstract

Objectives: To describe end of life care in settings where, in the UK, most children die; to explore commonalities and differences within and between settings; and to test whether there are distinct, alternative models of end of life care.

Methods: An online survey of UK neonatal units (NNUs), paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and children/young people's cancer principal treatment centres (PTCs) collected data on aspects of service organisation, delivery and practice relevant to end of life outcomes or experiences (referred to as the core elements of end of life care) across three domains: care of the child, care of the parent and bereavement care.

Results: 91 units/centres returned a survey (37% response rate). There was variation within and between settings in terms of whether and how core elements of end of life care were provided. PTCs were more likely than NNUs and PICUs to have palliative care expertise strongly embedded in the multidisciplinary team (MDT), and to have the widest range of clinical and non-clinical professions represented in the MDT. However, bereavement care was more limited. Many settings were limited in the practical and psychosocial-spiritual care and support available to parents.

Conclusions: Children at end of life, and families, experience differences in care that evidence indicates matter to them and impact outcomes. Some differences appear to be related to the type of setting. Subsequent stages of this research (the ENHANCE study) will investigate the relative contribution of these core elements of end of life care to child/parent outcomes and experiences.

Keywords: Paediatrics; Service evaluation; Terminal care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Graphical representation of differences between respondents in terms of core elements of end of life care.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Child Death Review Programme Patterns and trends of child deaths in wales 2011-2020. 2022
    1. National Health Service What end of life care involves - end of life care. 2022
    1. Downar J, Goldman R, Pinto R, et al. The “surprise question” for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2017;189:E484–93. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160775. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yarnell CJ, Jewell LM, Astell A, et al. Observational study of agreement between attending and trainee physicians on the surprise question: “Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?”. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0247571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247571. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burke K, Coombes LH, Menezes A, et al. The “surprise” question in paediatric palliative care: A prospective cohort study. Palliat Med. 2018;32:535–42. doi: 10.1177/0269216317716061. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms