Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Nov 28;22(1):317.
doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03590-4.

Neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer-one year follow-up results of standard versus total neoadjuvant strategies

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer-one year follow-up results of standard versus total neoadjuvant strategies

Luís Correia Gomes et al. World J Surg Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) poses a significantly challenge in clinical management, requiring a multimodal treatment approach. Among innovative strategies, Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) has emerged, delivering all planned chemotherapy before surgery.

Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the real-world application and efficacy of TNT and to compare it with the non-TNT standard strategy.

Methods: This retrospective study compared locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma patients treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) in 2022 with those who underwent traditional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in 2020-2021. The primary endpoints were the pathologic complete response rate and the sustained clinical complete response rate in patients under W&W.

Results: Among 107 patients (54.2% male, mean age 62.48 years), non-TNT (67 patients) and TNT (40 patients) mean follow-ups were 26.7 and 8.2 months, respectively. No differences in gender(p = 0.163), staging (p = 0.707), or location (p = 0.727) were noted. TNT patients received more short-course radiotherapy (42.5% vs1.5%, p < 0.001). Clinical responses favored TNT (p = 0.030) with no significant differences in pathological responses, recurrence rates, or survival. TNT exhibited higher chemotherapy completion (p = 0.007) and lower adverse events (p < 0.001). Post-surgery events showed no significant differences (p = 0.470). Single center with retrospective design and carries limitations that may restrict the generalizability of the findings and the relatively short follow-up duration are our main limitations.

Conclusion: Our data add to the body of literature favoring the TNT treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer, aiming to achieve comparable complete response rates with less adverse events.

Keywords: Adjuvant chemotherapy; Chemoradiotherapy; Complete clinical response; Locally advanced rectal cancer; Total neoadjuvant therapy; Treatment completion rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the local institutional Ethical Committee board (Comissão de Etica para a Saúde of Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, with the protocol code UIC/1649). Consent for publication: The manuscript does not contain any individual person’s data in any form, so inform consent is not necessary. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(a) Without re-evaluation. TNT: Total Neoadjuvant Therapy, TME: Total Mesorectal Excision, mrf: Mesorectal fascia; EMVI: Extramural Venous Invasion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Estimated survival curve with Kaplan–Meier. There’s no difference regarding disease-free and estimated survival between both groups. TNT: Total Neoadjuvant Treatment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Disease-free curve with Kaplan–Meier. There's no difference regarding disease-free and estimated survival between both groups. TNT: Total Neoadjuvant Treatment

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021May;71(3):209–49. 10.3322/caac.21660. (Epub 2021 Feb 4 PMID: 33538338). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oronsky B, Reid T, Larson C, Knox SJ. Locally advanced rectal cancer: The past, present, and future. Semin Oncol. 2020Feb;47(1):85–92. 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.02.001. (Epub 2020 Feb 21 PMID: 32147127). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM, Lammering G, Nelemans PJ, Engelen SM, van Dam RM, Jansen RL, Sosef M, Leijtens JW, Hulsewé KW, Buijsen J, Beets GL. Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011D 10;29(35):4633–40. 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.7176. Epub 2011 Nov 7 PMID: 22067400. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Valk MJM, Hilling DE, Bastiaannet E, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Beets GL, Figueiredo NL, Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Renehan AG, van de Velde CJH; IWWD Consortium. Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study. Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2537–2545. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31078-X. PMID: 29976470. - PubMed
    1. Bahadoer RR, Dijkstra EA, van Etten B, Marijnen CAM, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, Roodvoets AGH, Nagtegaal ID, Beets-Tan RGH, Blomqvist LK, Fokstuen T, Ten Tije AJ, Capdevila J, Hendriks MP, Edhemovic I, Cervantes A, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJH, Hospers GAP; RAPIDO collaborative investigators. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):29–42. 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30555-6. Epub 2020 Dec 7. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):e42. PMID: 33301740.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources