Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 28;10(1):126.
doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00633-8.

"I just don't know enough": Australian perspectives on community involvement in health and medical research

Fiona Russo  1 , Isabella Sherburn  2 , Keri Finlay  2 , Jack Nunn  3 , Monica Ferrie  4 , Anne McKenzie  5 , Sean Murray  6   7 , John Cannings  6 , Greg Pratt  8 , Tiffany Boughtwood  2
Affiliations

"I just don't know enough": Australian perspectives on community involvement in health and medical research

Fiona Russo et al. Res Involv Engagem. .

Abstract

Background: There is increasing global support from governments and other funding bodies for community involvement in research, alongside a scientific and moral imperative for responsible and ethical research practice. Ninety per cent of Australian patient-led organisations in rare diseases have clearly articulated research priorities, indicating a desire among people affected by disease to be involved in research that impacts their communities. Philanthropic research, which is likely to have predominantly community-minded priorities, is worth over AU$1 billion annually and increased more than 100% between 2007 and 2017.

Aims: This research aimed to understand public perspectives on community involvement in health-related research activities, and to inform the development of guidelines for genomic researchers to improve this involvement.

Methods: A 37-question survey was completed by 1,156 members of the Australian public via Dynata. The survey was co-designed by the Involve Australia Working Group of community members within Australian Genomics. Results from 1156 responses were analysed.

Results: Key themes emerging from the survey data that impact potential involvement were low community confidence to contribute, a limited understanding of community involvement, roles and recognition, trust and governance of data, perceived trustworthiness of research funders, and factors related to time and personal resources. A variety of motivations for involvement were also stated.

Conclusion: Members of the Australian public are interested in research involvement; however the differences between involvement and participation are poorly understood and a variety of barriers still exist. Researchers must actively reach out into communities and offer opportunities to engage with research and identify community priorities.

Keywords: Australia; Community; Engagement; Genomic research; Involvement; Perspectives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics and Consent to Participate: HREC Reference Number: HREC/81078/RCHM-2022 RCH HREC Reference Number: 81078 The above project has received ethical approval from The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC). Informed consent was supplied by all respondents. Consent for publication: All authors affirm consent for publication of this manuscript, which is not under consideration with any other publication. Competing interests: JN is on the Editorial Board of Research Involvement and Engagement. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Research experience and health conditions. *Some overlap between people with a health condition and people living with someone with a health condition
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A and B): Factors influencing community involvement in research
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hallowell N. Nuffield Council on Bioethics Report: novel techniques for the prevention of mitochondrial DNA disorders: an ethical review London: Nuffield Council of Bioethics 2012. Genomics Soc Policy. 2012;8(2).
    1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Annual Report 2012–13. 2013; https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/cihr_annual_report_2012-13_e.pdf.
    1. McKenzie A. Principles for consumer involvement in health and medical research. Respirology. 2023;28(5). - PubMed
    1. Borthwick J, Evertsz N, Pratt B. How should communities be meaningfully engaged (if at all) when setting priorities for biomedical research? Perspectives from the biomedical research community. BMC Med Ethics. 2023;24(1):6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Research: James Lind Alliance United Kingdom. n.d. https://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/.

LinkOut - more resources