Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 28;16(10):e72562.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.72562. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions (DHI) in Chronic Pain Management: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence and Emerging Trends

Shannon Weatherly  1 , Tara McKenna  1 , Simon Wahba  1 , Arielle Friedman  1 , Wesley Goltry  1 , Talha Wahid  1 , Hussein Abourahma  1 , Kenneth Lee  1 , Ahmed Rehman  1 , Ali Odeh  1 , Joshua Costin  2
Affiliations

Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions (DHI) in Chronic Pain Management: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence and Emerging Trends

Shannon Weatherly et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

This review aims to address the impact of digital health interventions (DHIs) on chronic pain management, specifically, mHealth, eHealth, wearable devices, virtual reality (VR), and artificial intelligence. The following study identifies and assesses DHIs' efficacy in specific chronic pain conditions and then extrapolates improved outcomes and patient groups that benefit from their use. Using a systematic methodology, this review synthesizes findings that could improve knowledge for patients and practitioners in chronic pain management while also addressing gaps in understanding the impact of DHIs. Sub-questions guide the identification of gaps and recommendations assessing DHIs' effectiveness for pain reduction and improved quality of life. A systematic search across databases (EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Central) targets original, English-language, peer-reviewed studies (2013-2023). The inclusion criteria cover DHIs in chronic pain management for adults age 18+, excluding non-full texts, reviews, opinion pieces, or unrelated articles. Search terms include "chronic pain management" OR "long-term pain relief strategies" OR "sustained pain alleviation" OR "pain control for chronic conditions" OR "chronic pain" AND "ehealth interventions" OR "mobile health interventions" OR "digital therapy" OR "health informatic solutions" OR "digital health intervention." After applying inclusion criteria, 34 articles from 11 countries are included, with studies conducted primarily in the United States (n = 17), United Kingdom (n = 4), and Australia (n = 3). DHIs are emerging as effective tools in pain management, as they can emphasize patient autonomy and communication with clinicians while enabling medical self-management in diverse populations. These various digital interventions show promise in reducing pharmaceutical usage and deferring surgical procedures, with most studies reporting positive outcomes in pain reduction. DHIs were also associated with positive mental health outcomes; however, some studies found no significant improvement. Additionally, interventions targeting pain catastrophizing showed varied results, with some app-based approaches demonstrating promise. Overall, the review underscores the potential of DHIs in improving chronic pain management outcomes.

Keywords: digital health technology; digital therapeutics; mobile health technology; pain assessment; remote healthcare; wearable devices; wearable technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow chart
The PRISMA flow chart tracks the article selection process leading to the inclusion of 34 articles in this review
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of included study relative to chronic pain condition type
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of studies analyzed by country origin
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The promise of digital health: then, now, and the future. Abernethy A, Adams L, Barrett M, et al. NAM Perspect. 2022;2022 - PMC - PubMed
    1. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic neuropathic pain. Scholz J, Finnerup NB, Attal N, et al. Pain. 2019;160:53–59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chronic pain: a review of its epidemiology and associated factors in population-based studies. Mills SE, Nicolson KP, Smith BH. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123:0–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chronic postsurgical pain: current evidence for prevention and management. Thapa P, Euasobhon P. Korean J Pain. 2018;31:155–173. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alternative methods for defining osteoarthritis and the impact on estimating prevalence in a US population-based survey. Cisternas MG, Murphy L, Sacks JJ, Solomon DH, Pasta DJ, Helmick CG. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016;68:574–580. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources