Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;17(6):e004687.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.124.004687. Epub 2024 Nov 29.

Polygenic Prediction of Recurrent Events After Early-Onset Myocardial Infarction

Affiliations

Polygenic Prediction of Recurrent Events After Early-Onset Myocardial Infarction

Maddalena Ardissino et al. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a complex disease caused by both lifestyle and genetic factors. This study aims to investigate the predictive value of genetic risk, in addition to traditional cardiovascular risk factors, for recurrent events following early-onset MI.

Methods: The Italian Genetic Study of Early-Onset Myocardial Infarction is a cohort study enrolling patients with MI before 45 years. Monogenic variants causing familial hypercholesterolemia were identified, and a coronary artery disease polygenic score (PGS) was calculated. Ten-fold cross-validated Cox proportional hazards models were fitted sequentially including all clinical variables, the PGS, and monogenic variants on the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, stroke, or revascularization.

Results: During a 19.9-year follow-up, 847 (50.7%) patients experienced recurrent events. Each 1-SD higher PGS was associated with a 21% higher hazard of recurrent events (hazard ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.13-1.31]; P=4.04×10-6). Except for secondary prevention, PGS was the strongest determinant of recurrent event risk (C index, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.54-0.58]) compared with clinical risk factors. Overall, predictive performance of clinical risk factors (C index, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.67-0.71]) improved after adding the PGS (C index, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.68-0.71]; P=0.006). When dividing the population by PGS quintiles, the highest fifth had a 57% higher hazard of recurrent events than the lowest fifth (hazard ratio, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.26-1.96]; P=5.57×10-5).

Conclusions: When compared with other clinical risk factors, PGS was the strongest predictor of event recurrence among patients with an early-onset MI. Though the discriminative power of recurrent event prediction in this cohort was modest, the addition of PGS significantly improved discrimination.

Keywords: cardiovascular diseases; coronary artery disease; genetic risk score; genetics; heart disease risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Natarajan reports research grants from Allelica, Amgen, Apple, Boston Scientific, Genentech/Roche, and Novartis; personal fees from Allelica, Apple, AstraZeneca, Blackstone Life Sciences, Creative Education Concepts, CRISPR Therapeutics, Eli Lilly & Co, Foresite Labs, Genentech/Roche, GV, HeartFlow, Magnet Biomedicine, Merck, and Novartis; scientific advisory board membership of Esperion Therapeutics, Preciseli, and TenSixteen Bio; scientific cofounder of TenSixteen Bio; equity in MyOme, Preciseli, and TenSixteen Bio; and spousal employment at Vertex Pharmaceuticals, all unrelated to the present work. Dr Honigberg reports consulting fees from CRISPR Therapeutics and Comanche Biopharma, advisory board service for Miga Health, and grant support from Genentech, all unrelated to the present work. Dr Inouye is a trustee of the Public Health Genomics Foundation, a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Open Targets, and has a research collaboration with AstraZeneca PLC, which is unrelated to this study. Dr Butterworth reports institutional grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biogen, BioMarin, Bioverativ, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi. The other authors report no conflicts.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design and data processing. metaGRS indicates polygenic risk score.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Incidence of recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events during follow-up among patients with early-onset myocardial infarction with high (top fifth), medium (middle three fifths), and low (bottom fifth) polygenic risk based on metaGRS. PGS indicates polygenic score; metaGRS, polygenic risk score.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cumulative incidence of recurrent cardiovascular events among patients with early-onset myocardial infarction with high (top fifth), medium (middle three fifths), and low (bottom fifth) polygenic risk based on metaGRS. metaGRS indicates polygenic risk score.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Discrimination ability of conventional risk factors, secondary prevention, polygenic score (metaGRS), and monogenic variants for recurrent cardiovascular events. All models include age, sex, and 10 genetic principal components as covariates. metaGRS indicates polygenic risk score.

References

    1. Marston NA, Pirruccello JP, Melloni GEM, Koyama S, Kamanu FK, Weng LC, Roselli C, Kamatani Y, Komuro I, Aragam KG, et al. . Predictive utility of a coronary artery disease polygenic risk score in primary prevention. JAMA Cardiol. 2023;8:130–137. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.4466 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inouye M, Abraham G, Nelson CP, Wood AM, Sweeting MJ, Dudbridge F, Lai FY, Kaptoge S, Brozynska M, Wang T, et al. ; UK Biobank CardioMetabolic Consortium CHD Working Group. Genomic risk prediction of coronary artery disease in 480,000 adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1883–1893. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.079 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guarischi-Sousa R, Salfati E, Kho PF, Iyer KR, Hilliard AT, Herrington DM, Tsao PS, Clarke SL, Assimes TL. Contemporary polygenic scores of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary artery disease predict coronary atherosclerosis in adolescents and young adults. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2023;16:480. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.122.004047 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khan SS, Page C, Wojdyla DM, Schwartz YY, Greenland P, Pencina MJ. Predictive utility of a validated polygenic risk score for long-term risk of coronary heart disease in young and middle-aged adults. Circulation. 2022;146:587–596. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058426 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sun L, Pennells L, Kaptoge S, Nelson CP, Ritchie SC, Abraham G, Arnold M, Bell S, Bolton T, Burgess S, et al. . Polygenic risk scores in cardiovascular risk prediction: a cohort study and modelling analyses. PLoS Med. 2021;18:e1003498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003498 - PMC - PubMed