Real-World Experience of Imipenem-Relebactam Treatment as Salvage Therapy in Difficult-to-Treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections (IMRECOR Study)
- PMID: 39612160
- PMCID: PMC11782751
- DOI: 10.1007/s40121-024-01077-z
Real-World Experience of Imipenem-Relebactam Treatment as Salvage Therapy in Difficult-to-Treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections (IMRECOR Study)
Abstract
Introduction: Difficult-to-treat-resistant (DTR) infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa represent a global public health threat, prioritizing the search and development of new antibiotics for this microorganism.
Methods: We present the real-life experience of the compassionate use of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in a descriptive study involving 14 patients with DTR-P. aeruginosa infection and limited treatment options.
Results: The primary source of infection was skin and soft tissue infection, 57.1% (8/14), followed by respiratory infection-pneumonia, 28.6% (4/14). At the onset of infection, 71.4% (10/14) of patients were in the intensive care unit (ICU). All our patients had a Charlson Score of ≥ 3. Septic shock was observed in 64.3% (9/14) of patients. The median treatment duration was 15 days, and no patient experienced an adverse event that required treatment interruption. All-cause 30-day mortality was observed in 42.9% of cases (6/14), while clinical efficacy and microbiological success were observed in 64.3% (9/14).
Conclusions: Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam may represent a treatment option for patients with DTR-P. aeruginosa infections, which should be validated in prospective clinical trials.
Keywords: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Carbapenem; Cilastatin; Imipenem; Multidrug; Relebactam; Resistant.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of Interest: All named authors of this article confirm that they have nothing to declare. Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee (code 5317) of Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
References
-
- Kadri SS, Adjemian J, Lai YL, et al. Difficult-to-treat resistance in Gram-negative bacteremia at 173 US hospitals: retrospective cohort analysis of prevalence, predictors, and outcome of resistance to all first-line agents. Clin Infect Dis An Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2018;67:1803. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kaye KS, Boucher HW, Brown ML, et al. Comparison of treatment outcomes between analysis populations in the RESTORE-IMI 1 phase 3 trial of imipenem–cilastatin–relebactam versus colistin plus imipenem–cilastatin in patients with imipenem-nonsusceptible bacterial infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(5):e02203–19 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Titov I, Wunderink RG, Roquilly A, et al. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam versus piperacillin/tazobactam in adults with hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study). Clin Infect Dis An Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2021;73:e4539. - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources