Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 May;132(5):527-537.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.11.021. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

Macular Edema Ranibizumab versus Intravitreal Anti-inflammatory Therapy Trial: 24-Week Outcomes of Uveitic Macular Edema Re-treatment

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Macular Edema Ranibizumab versus Intravitreal Anti-inflammatory Therapy Trial: 24-Week Outcomes of Uveitic Macular Edema Re-treatment

Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment Trial (MUST) Research Group et al. Ophthalmology. 2025 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluation of longer-term effectiveness of 3 intravitreal therapies (methotrexate, ranibizumab, or dexamethasone implant) for participants enrolled in the randomized comparative effectiveness trial the Macular Edema Ranibizumab versus Intravitreal Anti-inflammatory Therapy (MERIT) Trial followed up for 24 weeks.

Design: Multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with masked evaluation of retinal thickness and visual acuity.

Participants: Patients with persistent or recurrent uveitic macular edema.

Methods: Participants from 33 centers were randomized 1:1:1 (stratified by presence or absence of concomitant systemic immunosuppression for uveitis) to receive a sequence of intravitreal treatments with dexamethasone implant, methotrexate, or ranibizumab. Participants with bilateral macular edema received the same treatment bilaterally. During 24 weeks of follow-up, nonassigned treatments were permitted beginning from 12 weeks for those meeting re-treatment criteria.

Main outcome measures: Central subfield thickness (CST) change from baseline OCT measurement was the main outcome. Secondary outcomes included change in mean standard letters of baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Analyses were conducted according to 2 principles: (1) as assigned, in which outcomes were analyzed according to their original randomized treatment, and (2) a supplementary censored analysis, in which data were excluded after an eye received a nonassigned treatment.

Results: Among 194 enrolled participants (225 eligible eyes), 177 participants (207 eyes) completed 24 weeks of follow-up. Eyes assigned to methotrexate (55%) and ranibizumab (37%) more frequently received nonassigned treatments (88% dexamethasone implant or intravitreal corticosteroid injection) compared with eyes assigned to dexamethasone (7%). In the as-assigned analysis, dexamethasone showed superior improvement in macular edema compared with ranibizumab (CST, 34% vs. 19%; P = 0.01), but not compared with methotrexate (CST, 31%; P = 0.59) after being superior to both other regimens at 12 weeks. However, in the censored analysis, only dexamethasone was associated with improvements in macular edema (CST, 34% vs 8% [P < 0.001] and 5% [P < 0.001]) and BCVA improvement of > 5 letters compared with methotrexate and ranibizumab, respectively. Dexamethasone more often was associated with intraocular pressure elevations of ≥ 24 mmHg (32%) and of ≥ 30 mmHg (10%).

Conclusions: Dexamethasone was more effective than methotrexate and ranibizumab for the treatment of persistent or recurrent uveitic macular edema through 24 weeks, with manageable side effects.

Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Keywords: Intravitreal therapy; Macular edema; Randomized controlled clinical trial; Uveitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: John A. Gonzales, MD, Birstol Myers Squibb (Consultant); Nisha R. Acharya, MD, MS, AbbVie, (Research support), Roche (Consultant); Elizabeth A. Sugar, PhD, none; Alyce E. Burke, MPH, none; Albert T. Vitale, MD, AbbVie, (Consultant), ACIONT; Vishali Gupta, MD, none; James P. Dunn, MD, none; Susan L. Lightman, PhD; FRCP; FRCOphth, none; Jennifer E. Thorne, MD, PhD, AbbVie (Consultant), Clearside (Consultant), Gilead (Consultant, DSMC Member), Roche (Consultant), Santen (Consultant), Tarsier Pharma (Scientific Advisory Board, equity owner), UpToDate (Consultant); John H. Kempen, MD, PhD, Betaliq (Equity owner), Tarsier Pharma (Equity owner); Janet T. Holbrook, PhD, none; Michael M. Altaweel, MD, none; and Douglas A. Jabs, MD, MBA, none.

References

    1. Rothova A, Suttorp-van Schulten MS, Frits Treffers W, Kijlstra A. Causes and frequency of blindness in patients with intraocular inflammatory disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(4):332–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Okhravi N, Lightman S. Cystoid macular edema in uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2003;11(1):29–38. - PubMed
    1. Lardenoye CW, van Kooij B, Rothova A. Impact of macular edema on visual acuity in uveitis. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(8):1446–9. - PubMed
    1. Levin MH, Pistilli M, Daniel E, Gangaputra SS, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT, et al. Incidence of visual improvement in uveitis cases with visual impairment caused by macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(2):588–95.e1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tomkins-Netzer O, Lightman SL, Burke AE, Sugar EA, Lim LL, Jaffe GJ, et al. Seven-Year Outcomes of Uveitic Macular Edema: The Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment Trial and Follow-up Study Results. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(5):719–28. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources