Ties that bind: understanding One Health networks and participation for zoonoses prevention and control in India
- PMID: 39616400
- PMCID: PMC11608486
- DOI: 10.1186/s42522-024-00118-4
Ties that bind: understanding One Health networks and participation for zoonoses prevention and control in India
Abstract
Background: Cross-sectoral collaborations as exemplified by the One Health approach, are widely endorsed as pragmatic avenues for addressing zoonotic diseases, but operationalisation remain limited in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs). Complexities and competing interests and agendas of key stakeholders and the underlying politico-administrative context can all shape outcomes of collaborative arrangements. Evidence is building that organised collaborations are complex political initiatives where different objectives; individual and institutional agendas need to be reconciled to incentivise collaborations.
Methods: Drawing on a qualitative network analysis of published sources on 'One Health' stakeholders supplemented with 26 multi-scale (national-state-district level) key-informant interviews (including policymakers, disease managers and public health experts), this paper characterises the fragmented and complex characteristics of institutional networks involved in zoonoses prevention and control in India.
Results: Our results highlight how the local socio-political and institutional contexts interact to modulate how and when collaborations occur (or not), the associated contingencies and stakeholder innovations in circumventing existing barriers (e.g. competing interests, distrust between actors, departmental bureaucracy) to cross-sector collaborations and zoonoses management. Aside from principal actors negotiating common ground in some instance, they also capitalised on political/institutional pressure to subtly 'manipulate' their subordinates as a way of fostering collaboration, especially in instances when the institutional and political stakes are high.
Conclusion: Altogether our findings suggest that cross-sectoral collaborations are by-product of political and institutional tinkering as long as individual actors and institutional interests converge and these dynamics must be embraced to embed meaningful and sustainable collaborations in local socio-political and administrative contexts.
Keywords: Cross-sector collaboration; India; Low-and middle-income countries; One health; Stakeholder mapping; Zoonosis.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The research was carried out as part of the MRC Health Systems (IndiaZooSystems) and MRC Global Health and Context (IndiaZooRisk) projects, which was approved by the Health Ministry Screening Committee (HMSC) (VIV0562023) and the respective Institutional Ethics Review Boards of the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (IRB/CBC/0003/ATV/07/2018 and IRB/CBC/006/ATV/10/2021) and the Institute of Public Health (IPH) Bangalore (IEC-FR/04/2017) in India, and the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (17–062 and 20–051) in the United Kingdom. All participants gave full prior-informed (verbal) consent before the interviews. The collated interview data were anonymised to protect the privacy of participants. The study was approved as part of the IndiaZooSystems and IndiaZooRisk + projects by the Health Ministry Screening Committee (HMSC) (VIV0562023) and the respective Institutional Ethics Review Boards of the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (IRB/CBC/0003/ATV/07/2018 and IRB/CBC/006/ATV/10/2021) and the Institute of Public Health (IPH) Bangalore (IEC-FR/04/2017) in India, and the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (17–062 and 20–051) in the United Kingdom. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Operationalising the "One Health" approach in India: facilitators of and barriers to effective cross-sector convergence for zoonoses prevention and control.BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 6;21(1):1517. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11545-7. BMC Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34362321 Free PMC article.
-
'It doesn't happen how you think, it is very complex!' Reconciling stakeholder priorities, evidence, and processes for zoonoses prioritisation in India.Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 22;11:1228950. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1228950. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37674686 Free PMC article.
-
Policy Processes in Multisectoral Tobacco Control in India: The Role of Institutional Architecture, Political Engagement and Legal Interventions.Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1703-1714. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.66. Epub 2021 Jul 14. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022. PMID: 34380195 Free PMC article.
-
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 37131927 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Towards achieving interorganisational collaboration between health-care providers: a realist evidence synthesis.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(6):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KPLT1423. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023. PMID: 37469292
References
-
- Asaaga FA, Young JC, Oommen MA, Chandarana R, August J, Joshi J, Chanda MM, Vanak AT, Srinivas PN, Hoti SL, Seshadri T. Operationalising the “One Health” approach in India: facilitators of and barriers to effective cross-sector convergence for zoonoses prevention and control. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1–21. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Paul MM, Jadeja NB, Sidhu N, Vanak AT. Whither one health in India. Natl Instit Adv Stud Bangalore. 2020;55(49):40.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources