Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Jan 28;333(4):295-306.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.24490.

HepB-CpG vs HepB-Alum Vaccine in People With HIV and Prior Vaccine Nonresponse: The BEe-HIVe Randomized Clinical Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

HepB-CpG vs HepB-Alum Vaccine in People With HIV and Prior Vaccine Nonresponse: The BEe-HIVe Randomized Clinical Trial

Kristen M Marks et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Nonresponse to hepatitis B vaccine is common among people with HIV, resulting in vulnerability to infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV).

Objective: To compare the seroprotection response achieved with a 2-dose (noninferiority, 10% margin) and a 3-dose hepatitis B vaccine with a cytosine phosphoguanine adjuvant (HepB-CpG vaccine) vs a conventional 3-dose hepatitis B vaccine with an aluminum hydroxide adjuvant (HepB-alum vaccine) in people with HIV and prior nonresponse to HepB-alum vaccine.

Design, setting, and participants: This phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial included people with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy (CD4 cell count ≥100 cells/μL and HIV RNA <1000 copies/mL) without past or present serological evidence of having HBV or a response to hepatitis B vaccine. From December 2020 to February 2023, 561 adults were enrolled in the study at 41 sites in 10 countries in Africa, Asia, North America, and South America with follow-up for the primary outcome analysis through September 4, 2023.

Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive 2 doses of HepB-CpG vaccine administered intramuscularly at weeks 0 and 4; 3 doses of HepB-CpG vaccine administered intramuscularly at weeks 0, 4, and 24; or 3 doses of HepB-alum vaccine administered intramuscularly at weeks 0, 4, and 24.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was a seroprotection response to hepatitis B vaccine (defined as level of antibody titer against hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] ≥10 mIU/mL) at week 12 for the 2-dose regimen (8 weeks after dose 2) and at week 28 for 3-dose regimens (4 weeks after dose 3). Key secondary outcomes included seroprotection response at additional time points, antibody titer against HBsAg, and adverse events within 4 weeks of hepatitis B vaccination.

Results: Of 561 participants included in the analysis (median age, 46 years [IQR, 31-56 years]); 64% were male; 17% of participants were Asian, 42% were Black, and 35% were White), a seroprotection response was achieved in 93.1% who received 2 doses of HepB-CpG vaccine (n = 174), in 99.4% who received 3 doses of HepB-CpG vaccine (n = 169), and in 80.6% who received 3 doses of HepB-alum vaccine (n = 165). The stratified difference in seroprotection response between the 2-dose HepB-CpG vaccine group and the 3-dose HepB-alum vaccine group was 12.5% (97.5% CI, 4.1%-20.9%), achieving noninferiority and indicating superiority. The 3-dose HepB-CpG vaccine regimen was superior to the 3-dose HepB-alum vaccine regimen (stratified difference in seroprotection response, 18.4% [repeated 97.5% CI, 10.4%-26.2%]). By week 12, more than 90% of participants who received HepB-CpG vaccine achieved a seroprotection response. The 3-dose regimen of HepB-CpG vaccine achieved a higher proportion of participants with antibody titer against HBsAg greater than 1000 mIU/mL (78.1%) vs the other 2 regimen groups (26.4% for 2 doses of HepB-CpG vaccine and 35.2% for 3 doses of HepB-alum vaccine). No unexpected safety issues were observed.

Conclusions and relevance: Among people with HIV and nonresponse to prior hepatitis B vaccination, both the 2-dose and 3-dose regimens of HepB-CpG vaccine achieved a superior seroprotection response compared with 3 doses of HepB-alum vaccine.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04193189.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Marks reported receiving personal fees from Gilead Sciences, Immorna, and Novo Nordisk. Dr Cox reported receiving funding from the AIDS Clincal Trials Group. Dr Vigil reported receiving personal fees from Gilead, ViiV, and Theratechnologies Research. Dr Omoz-Oarhe reported receiving grants from the Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership. Dr Price reported receiving grants from Gilead, AbbVie, Genentech, Zydus, VIR, and Cepheid. Dr Knowles reported receiving grants from the Frontier Science Foundation. Dr Sherman reported receiving nonfinancial support from Dynavax; receiving grants from AbbVie, Gilead, Helio, and Zydus; and receiving personal fees from MedPace, Horizon/Amgen, Pliant, and UpToDate. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Recruitment, Randomization, and Follow-Up in the Study
aIndividuals may have met more that 1 ineligibility criteria. Only the first known reason for exclusion was included. bThe trial protocol allowed delays in vaccine dose up to 4 weeks after the final scheduled dose. These delays occurred in 6 participants in the group that received 2 doses of hepatitis B vaccine with a cytosine phosphoguanine adjuvant, in 20 participants in the group that received 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine with a cytosine phosphoguanine adjuvant, and in 16 participants in the group that received 3 doses of conventional hepatitis B vaccine with an aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. cFor the primary outcome (study visit with measurement of the seroprotection response to a hepatitis B vaccine). dAdditional information appears in the statistical analysis plan in Supplement 2.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Efficacy Analysis for the Primary Outcome of Seroprotection Response to the Hepatitis B Vaccine
The seroprotection response to the hepatitis B vaccine was defined as a level of antibody titer against hepatitis B surface antigen of 10 mIU/mL or greater. A, Of 174 participants in the group that received 2 doses of HepB-CpG vaccine, 162 (93.1%) had a seroprotection response; of 169 participants in the group that received 3 doses of HepB-CpG vaccine, 168 (99.4%) had a seroprotection response; and of 165 participants in the group that received 3 doses of HepB-alum vaccine, 133 (80.6%) had a seroprotection response. B, The estimated differences included Newcombe 97.5% CIs that were stratified by sex assigned at birth and diabetes status. For the comparison of the 3-dose HepB-CpG vaccine group vs the 3-dose HepB-alum vaccine group, repeated 97.5% CIs were adjusted for group sequential monitoring. The reference line at 0% represents no difference and the reference line at −10% represents the prespecified noninferiority margin.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Seroprotection Response to the Hepatitis B Vaccine by Scheduled Study Weeks
Vaccine administration occurred at baseline (week 0) and week 4 in all 3 groups and at week 24 in the 2 groups that received 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine. The seroprotection response to the hepatitis B vaccine was defined as a level of antibody titer against hepatitis B surface antigen of 10 mIU/mL or greater. The trial protocol allowed delays in vaccine dose up to 4 weeks after the final scheduled dose. These delays occurred in 6 participants in the group that received 2 doses of HepB-CpG vaccine, in 20 participants in the group that received 3 doses of HepB-CpG vaccine, and in 16 participants in the group that received 3 doses of HepB-alum vaccine.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Level of Antibody Against Hepatitis B Surface Antigen at Primary Time Point
A level less than 5 mIU/mL was the assay lower limit of quantitation and a level greater than 1000 mIU/mL was the assay upper limit of quantitation.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Adverse Events Related to the Hepatitis B Vaccine
The adverse event terms are MedDRA preferred terms (version 26.1). An adverse event receiving grade 1 was mild; grade 2, moderate; grade 3, severe; and grade 4, potentially life-threatening. The grading system is from the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (version 2.1).

Comment on

References

    1. World Health Organization . Global hepatitis report 2024: action for access in low- and middle-income countries. Published April 9, 2024. Accessed November 6, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240091672
    1. Weng MK, Doshani M, Khan MA, et al. Universal hepatitis B vaccination in adults aged 19-59 years: updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices—United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(13):477-483. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7113a1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conners EE, Panagiotakopoulos L, Hofmeister MG, et al. Screening and testing for hepatitis B virus infection: CDC recommendations—United States, 2023. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2023;72(1):1-25. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7201a1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lopes VB, Hassing RJ, de Vries-Sluijs TE, et al. Long-term response rates of successful hepatitis B vaccination in HIV-infected patients. Vaccine. 2013;31(7):1040-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.12.047 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schillie S, Vellozzi C, Reingold A, et al. Prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2018;67(1):1-31. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6701a1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data

Grants and funding