Midterm survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes of a novel mechanical mitral valve prosthesis
- PMID: 39617318
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.11.029
Midterm survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes of a novel mechanical mitral valve prosthesis
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the midterm survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes of the On-X mechanical mitral valve, based on the 5-year results of the Prospective Randomized On-X Anticoagulation Clinical Trial (PROACT).
Method: PROACT Mitral was a multicenter study evaluating 401 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) with either Standard or Conform-X On-X mitral valves, comparing low-dose and standard-dose warfarin. Here we report prespecified secondary outcomes of survival, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, and valve hemodynamics as assessed by core lab-adjudicated echocardiography at 1, 3, and 5 years in the pooled population.
Results: Actuarial survival was 99.7% at 1 year, 95.1% at 3 years, and 92.4% at 5 years, with no significant difference between the Standard and Conform-X cuffs. Hemodynamic analysis revealed a mean transvalvular pressure gradient (MG) of 4.6 ± 2.0 mm Hg at 1 year, with no interaction between valve size and patient body surface area. MG values were consistent over time. Quality of life improved with 96.6% of patients in NYHA class I or II at the latest available follow-up of 3 or 5 years. There were no significant differences in survival, clinical, or hemodynamic outcomes between valve sizes.
Conclusions: The On-X mechanical mitral valve demonstrated favorable survival, stable hemodynamics, and enhanced quality of life up to 5 years postimplantation. Derived from high-quality, rigorous randomized trial data, these findings can guide decision making in young patients requiring MVR.
Keywords: hemodynamics; mechanical heart valve; mitral valve replacement; prosthetic valve; survival.
Copyright © 2024 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Statement Dr Chu reported speaking/lecture fees from Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, Terumo Aortic, and Artivion/CryoLife. Dr Gerdisch reported serving as a consultant/advisor for Artivion/CryoLife, Atricure, Edwards Lifesciences, and Zimmer Biomet. Dr Alexander reported receipt of research support from Artivion/CryoLife, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CSL Behring, Ferring, Humacyte, and XaTek and consulting payments/honoraria from AbbVie, Akros, Artivion/CryoLife, AtriCure, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ferring, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Pfizer, Portola, and Quantum Genomics. All other authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous