Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 1;10(1):90.
doi: 10.1038/s41405-024-00277-6.

Innovation and application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in dentistry - a scoping review

Affiliations

Innovation and application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in dentistry - a scoping review

Fahad Umer et al. BDJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized healthcare, yet their integration in dentistry remains underexplored. Therefore, this scoping review aims to systematically evaluate current literature on LLMs in dentistry.

Data sources: The search covered PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar, with studies selected based on predefined criteria. Data were extracted to identify applications, evaluation metrics, prompting strategies, and deployment levels of LLMs in dental practice.

Results: From 4079 records, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. ChatGPT was the predominant model, mainly used for post-operative patient queries. Likert scale was the most reported evaluation metric, and only two studies employed advanced prompting strategies. Most studies were at level 3 of deployment, indicating practical application but requiring refinement.

Conclusion: LLMs showed extensive applicability in dental specialties; however, reliance on ChatGPT necessitates diversified assessments across multiple LLMs. Standardizing reporting practices and employing advanced prompting techniques are crucial for transparency and reproducibility, necessitating continuous efforts to optimize LLM utility and address existing challenges.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethical approval: Ethical approval was not necessary because the scoping review utilized research data that are publicly available, and without involving human participants or identifiable personal data. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. PRISMA flowchart.
The figure illustrates the search and retrieval processes of studies via PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and IEEE Xplore. After comprehensive screening, 17 studies were found to be eligible and included in the analysis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Evaluation metrics utilized in the included studies.
The figure shows a brief description of the evaluation metrics used. The size of each colored box represents the number (weightage) of studies utilizing the individual metrics.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Graphical representation of user experience.
The figure shows the positive, negative, neutral and mixed perspective of the human evaluators reported in the included studies.

References

    1. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25:44–56. - PubMed
    1. Xu Y, Gong M, Chen J, Liu T, Zhang K, Batmanghelich K. Generative-discriminative complementary learning. Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell 2020;34:6526–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Denecke K, May R, Rivera-Romero O. Transformer models in healthcare: a survey and thematic analysis of potentials, shortcomings and risks. J Med Syst. 2024;48:23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Purushotham S, Meng C, Che Z, Liu Y. Benchmarking deep learning models on large healthcare datasets. J Biomed Inf. 2018;83:112–34. - PubMed
    1. Thirunavukarasu AJ, Ting DSJ, Elangovan K, Gutierrez L, Tan TF, Ting DSW. Large language models in medicine. Nat Med. 2023;29:1930–40. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources