One Concentration Does Not Fit All: It Is Time to Personalize the Therapeutic Range of Infliximab in Crohn Disease
- PMID: 39621838
- DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001251
One Concentration Does Not Fit All: It Is Time to Personalize the Therapeutic Range of Infliximab in Crohn Disease
Abstract
Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab is commonly performed based on trough concentration. However, doses and dosing intervals may be adapted to patient outcomes, and this trough concentration target may correspond to a large range of exposures in terms of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). The objectives of this study were to assess the real-life exposure to intravenous infliximab in patients with Crohn disease in remission at year 1 and to assess the evolution of exposure in patients who switched to subcutaneous infliximab.
Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective observational pharmacokinetic study in patients with Crohn disease who had available infliximab concentrations during intravenous and subcutaneous infliximab maintenance therapy as per the standard of care. Infliximab exposure parameters (AUCs and trough concentrations, C 0 ) were compared for different dosing regimens of intravenous infliximab before (intravenous) and after (subcutaneous) the switch.
Results: A total of 113 patients had 383 intravenous infliximab concentrations. Dosing intervals ranged from 4 to 12 weeks. The median/range/CV% C 0 , AUC 0-t , and AUC 0-8weeks were 5.3 mcg/mL [<LLoQ-49.6]/71.6%, 37,792 mcg.h/mL [4971-116,366]/33.1%, and 41,582 mcg.h/mL [7953-232,048]/43.9%, respectively. Forty-one patients had available paired C 0 after both intravenous and subcutaneous administration. A poor correlation was found between preswitch intravenous infliximab C 0 and postswitch subcutaneous infliximab C 0 .
Conclusions: In this study, the authors suggested that in patients treated with IV IFX, different targets of C 0 should be proposed according to treatment schemes and that AUC 0-t might be a relevant determinant of clinical remission. Moreover, exposure did not remain stable throughout the switch from IV to SC IFX in any patient. These variations may depend on the intravenous dosing interval before switching.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
B. Franck, C. Tron, M.-C. Verdier, E. Bellissant, and A.-S. Peaucelle declare no conflict of interest. X. Roblin served as a speaker, consultant, and/or advisory board member for MSD, Pfizer, Celltrion, Janssen, Takeda, AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Galapagos, Roche, and Theradiag. F. Lemaitre received research grants from Chiesi, Astellas, and Sandoz, and lecture fees from Gilead, Janssen, ViiV, Pfizer, and MSD. G. Bouguen received lecture fees from AbbVie, Ferring, MSD, Takeda, and Pfizer, and consultant fees from Takeda and Janssen.
References
-
- Vande Casteele N, Ferrante M, Van Assche G, et al. Trough concentrations of infliximab guide dosing for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:1320–1329.e3.
-
- Vande Casteele N, Herfarth H, Katz J, et al. American gastroenterological association institute technical review on the role of therapeutic drug monitoring in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:835–857.e6.
-
- Papamichael K, Cheifetz AS. Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: for every patient and every drug? Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2019;35:302–310.
-
- Bortlik M, Duricova D, Malickova K, et al. Infliximab trough levels may predict sustained response to infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7:736–743.
-
- Schreiber S, Ben-Horin S, Leszczyszyn J, et al. Randomized controlled trial: subcutaneous vs intravenous infliximab CT-P13 maintenance in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2021;160:2340–2353.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
