Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 2:10:e63195.
doi: 10.2196/63195.

Dynamic Simulation Models of Suicide and Suicide-Related Behaviors: Systematic Review

Affiliations

Dynamic Simulation Models of Suicide and Suicide-Related Behaviors: Systematic Review

Genevieve Gariepy et al. JMIR Public Health Surveill. .

Abstract

Background: Suicide remains a public health priority worldwide with over 700,000 deaths annually, ranking as a leading cause of death among young adults. Traditional research methodologies have often fallen short in capturing the multifaceted nature of suicide, focusing on isolated risk factors rather than the complex interplay of individual, social, and environmental influences. Recognizing these limitations, there is a growing recognition of the value of dynamic simulation modeling to inform suicide prevention planning.

Objective: This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of existing dynamic models of population-level suicide and suicide-related behaviors, and to summarize their methodologies, applications, and outcomes.

Methods: Eight databases were searched, including MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Compendex, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, and medRxiv, from inception to July 2023. We developed a search strategy in consultation with a research librarian. Two reviewers independently conducted the title and abstract and full-text screenings including studies using dynamic modeling methods (eg, System Dynamics and agent-based modeling) for suicide or suicide-related behaviors at the population level, and excluding studies on microbiology, bioinformatics, pharmacology, nondynamic modeling methods, and nonprimary modeling reports (eg, editorials and reviews). Reviewers extracted the data using a standardized form and assessed the quality of reporting using the STRESS (Strengthening the Reporting of Empirical Simulation Studies) guidelines. A narrative synthesis was conducted for the included studies.

Results: The search identified 1574 studies, with 22 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, including 15 System Dynamics models, 6 agent-based models, and 1 microsimulation model. The studies primarily targeted populations in Australia and the United States, with some focusing on hypothetical scenarios. The models addressed various interventions ranging from specific clinical and health service interventions, such as mental health service capacity increases, to broader social determinants, including employment programs and reduction in access to means of suicide. The studies demonstrated the utility of dynamic models in identifying the synergistic effects of combined interventions and understanding the temporal dynamics of intervention impacts.

Conclusions: Dynamic modeling of suicide and suicide-related behaviors, though still an emerging area, is expanding rapidly, adapting to a range of questions, settings, and contexts. While the quality of reporting was overall adequate, some studies lacked detailed reporting on model transparency and reproducibility. This review highlights the potential of dynamic modeling as a tool to support decision-making and to further our understanding of the complex dynamics of suicide and its related behaviors.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42022346617; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=346617.

Keywords: agent-based modeling; complex system; complexity science; database; depression; discrete-event simulation; dynamic modeling; dynamic simulation; mental state; microsimulation; qualitative study; stress; suicide; system dynamics; systematic review; systems science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study selection.

Similar articles

References

    1. Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan. World Health Organization. 2021. [2024-11-26]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240031029 .
    1. Naghavi M, Global Burden of Disease Self-Harm Collaborators Global, regional, and national burden of suicide mortality 1990 to 2016: systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. BMJ. 2019;364:l94. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l94. http://www.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=31339847 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suicide Worldwide in 2019: Global Health Estimates. World Health Organization. 2021. [2024-11-26]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240026643 .
    1. Live Life: An Implementation Guide for Suicide Prevention. World Health Organization. 2021. [2024-11-26]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240026629 .
    1. Thompson LH, Lang JJ, Olibris B, Gauthier-Beaupré A, Cook H, Gillies D, Orpana H. Participatory model building for suicide prevention in Canada. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020;14:27. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00359-6. https://ijmhs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13033-020-00359-6 359 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources