Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 1;63(12):1228-1237.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20240822-00528.

[Association between plasma-glycosylated hemoglobin A1c/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio in Chinese adults]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations

[Association between plasma-glycosylated hemoglobin A1c/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio in Chinese adults]

[Article in Chinese]
W J Dong et al. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. .

Abstract

Objective: To explore the relationship between glycosylated hemoglobin A1c/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (HbA1c/HDL-C) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) in Chinese adults. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the clinical data of 43 820 community residents (age>40 years) from the Risk Evaluation of Cancers in Chinese Diabetic Individuals (REACTION study; March-December 2012) across eight centers (Liaoning, Guangdong, Shanghai, Gansu, Guangxi, Henan, Hubei, and Sichuan) in China were collected and analyzed. Participants were divided into three groups based on UACR levels:<10 mg/g, 10-30 mg/g, and >30 mg/g. The HbA1c/HDL-C ratio was divided into four groups according to quartile division of the subjects: 1st quartile (Q1<3.79), 2nd quartile (3.79≤Q2<4.59), 3rd quartile (4.59≤Q3≤5.66), and 4th quartile (Q4>5.66). Multivariate ordinal logistic regression model was used to analyze the relationship between HbA1c/HDL-C and UACR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to explore the predictive value of HbA1c/HDL-C to UACR. Results: The 43 820 subjects included 13 452 (30.70%) male and 30 378 (69.30%) female patients, with an average age of (58.00±0.05) years. According to results of one-way analysis of variance analysis, the HbA1c/HDL-C ratio was significantly associated with the risk of increased UACR (F=495.73, P<0.001). After adjusting for clinically relevant confounding variables in logistic regression model, compared with participants with the lowest HbA1c/HDL-C ratio (Q1), women with the highest HbA1c/HDL-C ratio (Q4) had a 1.483-fold (95%CI 1.376-1.598, P<0.001) and men had a 1.161-fold (95%CI 1.019-1.323, P<0.001) increased risk of UACR. The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of HbA1c/HDL-C for predicting increased UACR was 0.623 (95%CI 0.597-0.606), with a sensitivity of 60.18% and a specificity of 54.91%. The HbA1c/HDL-C ratio showed the highest predictive value of all glycemic and lipidemic parameters. In individuals with well-controlled blood glucose (HbA1c<6.5%) or lipid levels (HDL-C≥1.0 mmol/L), the HbA1c/HDL-C ratio was still independently associated with the risk of increased UACR after adjusting for confounding variables [OR(95%CI) of quartile 4: 1.563 (1.210-2.019, P=0.001) in participants with HbA1c<6.5% and 1.822 (1.687-1.968, P<0.001) in participants with HDL-C≥1.0 mmol/L]. Conclusion: As a novel compound indicator for evaluating glucose homeostasis and dyslipidemia, the HbA1c/HDL-C ratio was independently associated with increased UACR in the general population aged>40 years in China, which was superior to both glycemic and lipid parameters alone.

目的: 探讨在中国普通成年人群中血浆糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)/高密度脂蛋白(HDL-C)比值与尿白蛋白/肌酐比值(UACR)的关系。 方法: 横断面研究。收集并分析于2012年3至12月进行的中国糖尿病个体的癌症风险评估研究(REACTION研究)共计43 820名年龄>40岁的社区居民的临床资料,涉及中国8个地区(辽宁、广东、上海、甘肃、广西、河南、湖北、四川)。研究对象根据UACR水平分为3组:<10 mg/g、10~30 mg/g和>30 mg/g组;根据HbA1c/HDL-C四分位数分为Q1(<3.79),Q2(3.79~<4.59),Q3(4.59~5.66),Q4(>5.66)组。采用多元有序logistic回归模型法分析探讨HbA1c/HDL-C与UACR的关系。利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析HbA1c/HDL-C对于UACR升高的预测价值。 结果: 43 820名参与者的年龄为(58.00±0.05)岁,其中男性13 452人(30.70%),女性30 368人(69.30%)。单因素分析显示,HbA1c/HDL-C随UACR升高而升高(F=495.73,P<0.001)。logistic回归模型在校正其他临床相关混杂变量后,与HbA1c/HDL-C比值最低(Q1组)的患者相比,Q4组女性患者UACR升高的风险为1.483倍(95%CI 1.376~1.598,P<0.001),而男性患者为1.161倍(95%CI 1.019~1.323,P<0.001)。ROC曲线分析显示,HbA1c/HDL-C预测UACR升高的曲线下面积为0.623,95%CI为0.597~0.606,敏感度为60.18%,特异度为54.91%,与血糖、血脂等指标相比具有最高的预测价值。在HbA1c正常(<6.5%)或HDL-C正常(≥1.0 mmol/L)的情况下,HbA1c/HDL-C仍与UACR升高的风险独立相关(HbA1c<6.5%时Q4组比Q1组:OR=1.563,95%CI 1.210~2.019,P=0.001;HDL-C≥1.0 mmol/L时Q4组比Q1组:OR=1.822,95%CI 1.687~1.968,P<0.001)。 结论: HbA1c/HDL-C比值作为评价血糖稳态和血脂异常的新型复合指标,在中国普通成年人群(年龄>40岁)中,其与UACR增加的风险显著相关,优于血糖、血脂参数等单一指标。.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types