Salvage irreversible electroporation for locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive radiotherapy: a systematic review
- PMID: 39623055
- DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00926-9
Salvage irreversible electroporation for locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive radiotherapy: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: To systematically evaluate the available evidence regarding the effect of salvage irreversible electroporation (IRE) in patients with local recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after definitive radiotherapy (RT).
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed-MEDLINE and the Web of Science. The following search terms were used: "irreversible electroporation AND recurrent prostate cancer", ''salvage irreversible electroporation AND prostate cancer AND radiation", "nanoknife AND recurrent prostate cancer", and ''salvage irreversible electroporation AND prostate cancer" by combining PICO (population, intervention, comparison, and outcome) terms.
Results: We identified 5 eligible studies. Following IRE, local oncological control was ranging from 67 to 78%. In-field and out-field lesion recurrences after IRE were ranging from 3 to 10% and from 8 to 14%, respectively. Only one study reported an overall metastasis-free survival rate of 91% and a 5-year progression-free survival rate of 60%. The post-IRE continence status ranged 73-100%. Two studies reported a decline in the proportion of patients maintaining erections sufficient for sexual intercourse and two studies reported 50% preservation of erection. The majority of complications were of a low-to-mild nature, classified as Clavien-Dindo grade I-II, with the exception of the development of a rectal fistula in a single case.
Conclusions: IRE represents an alternative salvage treatment option for patients with localised recurrent PCa following RT. The procedure offers a favourable safety profile and effective preservation of urinary function. The oncological results are promising, but further investigation is required.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Bergengren O, Pekala KR, Matsoukas K, Fainberg J, Mungovan SF, Bratt O, et al. 2022 update on prostate cancer epidemiology and risk factors-a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2023;842:191–206.
-
- Williams IS, McVey A, Perera S, O’Brien JS, Kostos L, Chen K, et al. Modern paradigms for prostate cancer detection and management. Med J Aust. 2022;2178:424–33.
-
- Petrelli F, Dottorini L, De Stefani A, Vavassori I, Luciani A. Localized prostate cancer in older patients: radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy versus observation. J Geriatr Oncol. 2024;156:101792.
-
- Kupelian PA, Mahadevan A, Reddy CA, Reuther AM, Klein EA. Use of different definitions of biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy changes conclusions about relative treatment efficacy for localized prostate cancer. Urology. 2006;683:593–8.
-
- Zietman AL, Bae K, Slater JD, Shipley WU, Efstathiou JA, Coen JJ, et al. Randomized trial comparing conventional-dose with high-dose conformal radiation therapy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results from proton radiation oncology group/american college of radiology 95-09. J Clin Oncol. 2010;287:1106–11.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical