Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 2;25(1):985.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08112-7.

Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Affiliations

Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Filippo Migliorini et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a surgical procedure for managing osteoarthritis of one joint compartment, most commonly the medial side. This systematic review investigates the causes of UKA revision. The outcomes of interest were establishing the revision rate, time to revision, and the most common causes of revision in the long- and midterm follow-up.

Methods: This study was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA statement. In October 2024, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase. All the clinical studies investigating the rate and causes of revision in UKA were accessed. Only studies with a minimum of 10 years of follow-up were considered.

Results: Data from 56 studies (13,540 patients) were collected. Of them, 65.6% were women. The mean length of the follow-up was 13.1 ± 3.0 years. The mean age of the patients was 65.6 ± 5.6 years, and the mean BMI was 28.5 ± 2.2 kg/m2. Revisions were performed in 8.8% (2641 of 30,140) of implanted UKAs. The mean time to revision was 6.5 ± 2.6 (range, 2.5 to 13.0) years.

Conclusion: 8.8% (2641 of 30,140) of UKAs were revised at a mean time of 6.5 ± 2.6 years.

Level of evidence: Level IV, systematic review.

Keywords: Knee; Revision; Survivorship; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study complies with ethical standards. Consent to publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart of the literature search

References

    1. Murphy L, Schwartz TA, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Tudor G, Koch G, Dragomir A, Kalsbeek WD, Luta G, Jordan JM. Lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(9):1207–13. 10.1002/art.24021. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M, Bridgett L, Williams S, Guillemin F, Hill CL, Laslett LL, Jones G, Cicuttini F, Osborne R, Vos T, Buchbinder R, Woolf A, March L. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1323–30. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763. - PubMed
    1. Ashraf S, Ackroyd C, Newman J. Compartmental knee arthroplasty. Curr Orthop. 2003;2(17):134–43.
    1. Ledingham J, Regan M, Jones A, Doherty M. Radiographic patterns and associations of osteoarthritis of the knee in patients referred to hospital. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993;52(7):520–6. 10.1136/ard.52.7.520. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Migliorini F, Tingart M, Niewiera M, Rath B, Eschweiler J. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29(4):947–55. 10.1007/s00590-018-2358-9. - PubMed

Publication types