Diagnosis and management of invasive fungal diseases by next-generation sequencing: are we there yet?
- PMID: 39623670
- PMCID: PMC12159265
- DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2024.2436396
Diagnosis and management of invasive fungal diseases by next-generation sequencing: are we there yet?
Abstract
Introduction: Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) are a serious threat to immunocompromised patients. Routine diagnostic methods have limited performance in identifying IFDs. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), including metagenomic NGS (mNGS) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), recently emerged as diagnostic methods that could provide more accurate and timely diagnoses and management of IFDs.
Areas covered: This article describes the emergence of NGS as a diagnostic tool to address the limitations of current tests. The literature regarding its application and clinical utility in the diagnosis of IFDs is reviewed. Practical considerations, challenges, and opportunities as they relate to the development and implementation of mNGS and WGS for fungal pathogens are discussed.
Expert opinion: NGS emerged over a decade ago with the potential to solve many of the challenges in diagnosing infectious diseases, including IFDs. However, published literature has yielded conflicting data about its clinical utility. The increased clinical adoption of NGS is improving our understanding of how to interpret and use its results to guide actionable decisions. Still, several gaps remain. As the cost, effort, and expertise involved in performing NGS decrease and the reporting of its results becomes standardized, NGS is poised to fill current gaps in the diagnosis of IFDs.
Keywords: Fungal infections; cancer; immunocompromised patients; invasive fungal disease; metagenomic; molecular diagnostics; next-generation sequencing; transplant patients.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
-
Donnelly JP, Chen SC, Kauffman CA, et al. Revision and Update of the Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. Sep 12;71(6):1367–1376.
**This reference provide important information on how invasive fungal diseases are defined.
-
-
- Chu S, McCormick TS, Lazarus HM, et al. Invasive fungal disease and the immunocompromised host including allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: Improved understanding and new strategic approach with sargramostim. Clin Immunol. 2021. Jul;228:108731. - PubMed
-
- Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Park BJ, et al. Prospective surveillance for invasive fungal infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, 2001–2006: overview of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET) Database. Clin Infect Dis. 2010. Apr 15;50(8):1091–100. - PubMed
-
- Neofytos D, Horn D, Anaissie E, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of invasive fungal infection in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: analysis of Multicenter Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH) Alliance registry. Clin Infect Dis. 2009. Feb 1;48(3):265–73. - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials