Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Dec 3:26:e60380.
doi: 10.2196/60380.

Application of Chatbots to Help Patients Self-Manage Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Application of Chatbots to Help Patients Self-Manage Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yibo Wu et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The number of people with diabetes is on the rise globally. Self-management and health education of patients are the keys to control diabetes. With the development of digital therapies and artificial intelligence, chatbots have the potential to provide health-related information and improve accessibility and effectiveness in the field of patient self-management.

Objective: This study systematically reviews the current research status and effectiveness of chatbots in the field of diabetes self-management to support the development of diabetes chatbots.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of chatbots that can help patients with diabetes with self-management was conducted. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched using keywords around diabetes, chatbots, conversational agents, virtual assistants, and more. The search period was from the date of creation of the databases to January 1, 2023. Research articles in English that fit the study topic were selected, and articles that did not fit the study topic or were not available in full text were excluded.

Results: In total, 25 studies were included in the review. In terms of study type, all articles could be classified as systematic design studies (n=8, 32%), pilot studies (n=8, 32%), and intervention studies (n=9, 36%). Many articles adopted a nonrandomized controlled trial design in intervention studies (n=6, 24%), and there was only 1 (4%) randomized controlled trial. In terms of research strategy, all articles can be divided into quantitative studies (n=10, 40%), mixed studies (n=6, 24%), and qualitative studies (n=1, 4%). The evaluation criteria for chatbot effectiveness can be divided into technical performance evaluation, user experience evaluation, and user health evaluation. Most chatbots (n=17, 68%) provided education and management focused on patient diet, exercise, glucose monitoring, medications, and complications, and only a few studies (n=2, 8%) provided education on mental health. The meta-analysis found that the chatbot intervention was effective in lowering blood glucose (mean difference 0.30, 95% CI 0.04-0.55; P=.02) and had no significant effect in reducing weight (mean difference 1.41, 95% CI -2.29 to 5.11; P=.46) compared with the baseline.

Conclusions: Chatbots have potential for the development of self-management for people with diabetes. However, the evidence level of current research is low, and higher level research (such as randomized controlled trials) is needed to strengthen the evidence base. More use of mixed research in the research strategy is needed to fully use the strengths of both quantitative and qualitative research. Appropriate and innovative theoretical frameworks should be used in the research to provide theoretical support for the study. In addition, researchers should focus on the personalized and user-friendly interactive features of chatbots, as well as improvements in study design.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; chatbot; diabetes; health education; self-management; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram showing the study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of fixed-effects and random-effects models in meta-analysis of HbA1c. HbA1c: hemoglobin A1c.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of fixed-effects and random-effects models in meta-analysis of weight.

References

    1. GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2023;402(10397):203–234. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01301-6. https://air.unimi.it/handle/2434/980231 S0140-6736(23)01301-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, Duncan BB, Stein C, Basit A, Chan JCN, Mbanya JC, Pavkov ME, Ramachandaran A, Wild SH, James S, Herman WH, Zhang P, Bommer C, Kuo S, Boyko EJ, Magliano DJ. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109119. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/34879977 S0168-8227(21)00478-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(Suppl 1):S20–S42. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S002.153954 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, Bannuru RR, Brown FM, Bruemmer D, Collins BS, Hilliard ME, Isaacs D, Johnson EL, Kahan S, Khunti K, Leon J, Lyons SK, Perry ML, Prahalad P, Pratley RE, Seley JJ, Stanton RC, Gabbay RA. 7. Diabetes technology: standards of care in diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(Suppl 1):S111–S127. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S007. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/36507635 148041 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Association of Diabetes CareEducation Specialists. Kolb L. An effective model of diabetes care and education: the ADCES7 self-care behaviors™. Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2021;47(1):30–53. doi: 10.1177/0145721720978154. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources